MOTIVATION: Genomic instability is one of the fundamental factors in tumorigenesis and tumor progression. Many studies have shown that copy-number abnormalities at the DNA level are important in the pathogenesis of cancer. Array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH), developed based on expression microarray technology, can reveal the chromosomal aberrations in segmental copies at a high resolution. However, due to the nature of aCGH, many standard expression data processing tools, such as data normalization, often fail to yield satisfactory results. RESULTS: We demonstrated a novel aCGH normalization algorithm, which provides an accurate aCGH data normalization by utilizing the dependency of neighboring probe measurements in aCGH experiments. To facilitate the study, we have developed a hidden Markov model (HMM) to simulate a series of aCGH experiments with random DNA copy number alterations that are used to validate the performance of our normalization. In addition, we applied the proposed normalization algorithm to an aCGH study of lung cancer cell lines. By using the proposed algorithm, data quality and the reliability of experimental results are significantly improved, and the distinct patterns of DNA copy number alternations are observed among those lung cancer cell lines. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Source codes and.gures may be found at http://ntumaps.cgm.ntu.edu.tw/aCGH_supplementary.
MOTIVATION: Genomic instability is one of the fundamental factors in tumorigenesis and tumor progression. Many studies have shown that copy-number abnormalities at the DNA level are important in the pathogenesis of cancer. Array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH), developed based on expression microarray technology, can reveal the chromosomal aberrations in segmental copies at a high resolution. However, due to the nature of aCGH, many standard expression data processing tools, such as data normalization, often fail to yield satisfactory results. RESULTS: We demonstrated a novel aCGH normalization algorithm, which provides an accurate aCGH data normalization by utilizing the dependency of neighboring probe measurements in aCGH experiments. To facilitate the study, we have developed a hidden Markov model (HMM) to simulate a series of aCGH experiments with random DNA copy number alterations that are used to validate the performance of our normalization. In addition, we applied the proposed normalization algorithm to an aCGH study of lung cancer cell lines. By using the proposed algorithm, data quality and the reliability of experimental results are significantly improved, and the distinct patterns of DNA copy number alternations are observed among those lung cancer cell lines. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Source codes and.gures may be found at http://ntumaps.cgm.ntu.edu.tw/aCGH_supplementary.
Authors: J R Pollack; C M Perou; A A Alizadeh; M B Eisen; A Pergamenschikov; C F Williams; S S Jeffrey; D Botstein; P O Brown Journal: Nat Genet Date: 1999-09 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Sanju Attoor; Edward R Dougherty; Yidong Chen; Michael L Bittner; Jeffrey M Trent Journal: Bioinformatics Date: 2004-09-28 Impact factor: 6.937
Authors: Mark A van de Wiel; Kyung In Kim; Sjoerd J Vosse; Wessel N van Wieringen; Saskia M Wilting; Bauke Ylstra Journal: Bioinformatics Date: 2007-01-31 Impact factor: 6.937
Authors: Jeremy D Bartos; Daniel P Gaile; Devin E McQuaid; Jeffrey M Conroy; Huferesh Darbary; Norma J Nowak; Annemarie Block; Nicholas J Petrelli; Arnold Mittelman; Daniel L Stoler; Garth R Anderson Journal: Mutat Res Date: 2007-01-02 Impact factor: 2.433
Authors: Richard M Neve; Koei Chin; Jane Fridlyand; Jennifer Yeh; Frederick L Baehner; Tea Fevr; Laura Clark; Nora Bayani; Jean-Philippe Coppe; Frances Tong; Terry Speed; Paul T Spellman; Sandy DeVries; Anna Lapuk; Nick J Wang; Wen-Lin Kuo; Jackie L Stilwell; Daniel Pinkel; Donna G Albertson; Frederic M Waldman; Frank McCormick; Robert B Dickson; Michael D Johnson; Marc Lippman; Stephen Ethier; Adi Gazdar; Joe W Gray Journal: Cancer Cell Date: 2006-12 Impact factor: 31.743
Authors: Koei Chin; Sandy DeVries; Jane Fridlyand; Paul T Spellman; Ritu Roydasgupta; Wen-Lin Kuo; Anna Lapuk; Richard M Neve; Zuwei Qian; Tom Ryder; Fanqing Chen; Heidi Feiler; Taku Tokuyasu; Chris Kingsley; Shanaz Dairkee; Zhenhang Meng; Karen Chew; Daniel Pinkel; Ajay Jain; Britt Marie Ljung; Laura Esserman; Donna G Albertson; Frederic M Waldman; Joe W Gray Journal: Cancer Cell Date: 2006-12 Impact factor: 31.743
Authors: D Pinkel; R Segraves; D Sudar; S Clark; I Poole; D Kowbel; C Collins; W L Kuo; C Chen; Y Zhai; S H Dairkee; B M Ljung; J W Gray; D G Albertson Journal: Nat Genet Date: 1998-10 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Emma J Raftis; Elisa Salvetti; Sandra Torriani; Giovanna E Felis; Paul W O'Toole Journal: Appl Environ Microbiol Date: 2010-12-03 Impact factor: 4.792
Authors: Armand Valsesia; Donata Rimoldi; Danielle Martinet; Mark Ibberson; Paola Benaglio; Manfredo Quadroni; Patrice Waridel; Muriel Gaillard; Mireille Pidoux; Blandine Rapin; Carlo Rivolta; Ioannis Xenarios; Andrew J G Simpson; Stylianos E Antonarakis; Jacques S Beckmann; C Victor Jongeneel; Christian Iseli; Brian J Stevenson Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-04-08 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Bart P P van Houte; Thomas W Binsl; Hannes Hettling; Walter Pirovano; Jaap Heringa Journal: BMC Genomics Date: 2009-08-26 Impact factor: 3.969
Authors: Armand Valsesia; Aurélien Macé; Sébastien Jacquemont; Jacques S Beckmann; Zoltán Kutalik Journal: Front Genet Date: 2013-05-30 Impact factor: 4.599