Literature DB >> 18603230

Menstrual cycle phase modulates cognitive control over male but not female stimuli.

Gloria M P Roberts1, Fiona Newell, Cristina Simões-Franklin, Hugh Garavan.   

Abstract

Evolutionary selection pressures have been one of the factors proposed to underlie sex differences in inhibitory control. Consequently, inhibitory control may vary as a function of the menstrual cycle and may be modulated by the stimuli being processed if these stimuli are related to reproductive success. We used functional MRI to study women's brain activation across the menstrual cycle on a GO/NOGO response inhibition task using attractive male and female faces as stimuli. We detected brain activity changes for both successful inhibitions and errors of commission that were unique to the male stimuli during the follicular phase of the menstrual cycle. That is, when pregnancy was possible women had superior inhibitory brain function and heightened detection of inhibitory failures when processing male stimuli. Moreover, we show that individual differences between females in sexual desire and social risk taking negatively correlate with error-related brain activity to the male stimuli during the follicular phase of the menstrual cycle. These results suggest an interaction between hormonal influences and stimulus-specific effects in producing an endophenotypic outcome predicted by evolutionary psychology, and suggest that the functioning of the brain's monitoring system can predict individual differences in both traits and real-world risk-taking behaviours.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18603230     DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.05.061

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  9 in total

1.  ALE meta-analysis on facial judgments of trustworthiness and attractiveness.

Authors:  D Bzdok; R Langner; S Caspers; F Kurth; U Habel; K Zilles; A Laird; Simon B Eickhoff
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 3.270

2.  Failure to find executive function deficits following one night's total sleep deprivation in university students under naturalistic conditions.

Authors:  Edward F Pace-Schott; Cendri A Hutcherson; Brenda Bemporad; Alexandra Morgan; Arjun Kumar; J Allan Hobson; Robert Stickgold
Journal:  Behav Sleep Med       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.964

3.  Individual differences influence two-digit number processing, but not their analog magnitude processing: a large-scale online study.

Authors:  Stefan Huber; Hans-Christoph Nuerk; Ulf-Dietrich Reips; Mojtaba Soltanlou
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-12-23

4.  Inhibit My Disinhibition: The Role of the Inferior Frontal Cortex in Sexual Inhibition and the Modulatory Influence of Sexual Excitation Proneness.

Authors:  Geraldine Rodriguez; Alexander T Sack; Marieke Dewitte; Teresa Schuhmann
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Clock Walking and Gender: How Circular Movements Influence Arithmetic Calculations.

Authors:  Luisa Lugli; Stefania D'Ascenzo; Anna M Borghi; Roberto Nicoletti
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-09-25

6.  The cycling brain: menstrual cycle related fluctuations in hippocampal and fronto-striatal activation and connectivity during cognitive tasks.

Authors:  Belinda Pletzer; Ti-Anni Harris; Andrea Scheuringer; Esmeralda Hidalgo-Lopez
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 7.853

7.  Individual differences in the effect of menstrual cycle on basal ganglia inhibitory control.

Authors:  Esmeralda Hidalgo-Lopez; Belinda Pletzer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Sex differences in the processing of global vs. local stimulus aspects in a two-digit number comparison task--an fMRI study.

Authors:  Belinda Pletzer; Martin Kronbichler; Hans-Christoph Nuerk; Hubert Kerschbaum
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Brands and Inhibition: A Go/No-Go Task Reveals the Power of Brand Influence.

Authors:  Nicholas Peatfield; Joanne Caulfield; John Parkinson; James Intriligator
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-06       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.