Literature DB >> 18603052

Stress cardiac single-photon emission computed tomographic imaging late after coronary artery bypass surgery for risk stratification and estimation of time to cardiac events.

Wanda Acampa1, Mario Petretta, Laura Evangelista, Gianantonio Nappi, Luca Luongo, Maria Piera Petretta, Alberto Cuocolo.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We assessed predictors and temporal characteristics of cardiac risk in patients undergoing stress single-photon emission computed tomography after coronary artery bypass grafting.
METHODS: Stress cardiac tomography was performed in 362 patients 5 years after coronary artery bypass grafting. Cardiac death and myocardial infarction were considered as events. Cox proportional hazards analysis was used to identify predictors of events and parametric survival analysis to predict time to events.
RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 27 months, 22 cardiac events occurred (6.1% cumulative event rate). At multivariable Cox analysis, ischemia at cardiac tomography (hazards ratio 3.7, 95% confidence interval 1.5-9.1; P = .004), and diabetes (hazards ratio 3.6, 95% confidence interval 1.5-8.5; P = .006) resulted in independent predictors of events. Event-free survival was 96% in patients with normal cardiac tomography, 86% in those with abnormal tomography without ischemia, and 70% in those with (log-rank 10.6, P for trend = .008). The parametric survival model revealed that the cardiac risk was greater for all time intervals and accelerated more over time in patients with ischemia than in those without (chi(2) 21.4, P < .0001). Patients without diabetes and normal cardiac tomography remained below a defined risk level (5%) for the entire follow-up period.
CONCLUSION: Stress cardiac tomography performed 5 years after coronary artery bypass grafting is useful to characterize the risk of cardiac events and its temporal variation. Parametric survival model estimates the predicted time to risk and the level of risk at specific time intervals after coronary artery bypass grafting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18603052     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.10.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  10 in total

1.  The role of radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging for asymptomatic individuals.

Authors:  Robert C Hendel; Brian G Abbott; Timothy M Bateman; Ron Blankstein; Dennis A Calnon; Jeffrey A Leppo; Jamshid Maddahi; Matthew M Schumaecker; Leslee J Shaw; R Parker Ward; David G Wolinsky
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Incremental prognostic value of coronary flow reserve assessed with single-photon emission computed tomography.

Authors:  Stefania Daniele; Carmela Nappi; Wanda Acampa; Giovanni Storto; Teresa Pellegrino; Francesca Ricci; Evgjeni Xhoxhi; Francesco Porcaro; Mario Petretta; Alberto Cuocolo
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2011-05-28       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Comparison of ESC and ACC/AHA guidelines for myocardial revascularization: are the differences clinically relevant? The European perspective.

Authors:  Mario Petretta; Alberto Cuocolo
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  Serial cardiac SPECT studies: Technical issues and clinical implications.

Authors:  Alberto Cuocolo; Raymond Taillefer
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2016-10-27       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 5.  Myocardial perfusion imaging after coronary revascularization: a clinical appraisal.

Authors:  Wanda Acampa; Maria Piera Petretta; Stefania Daniele; Pasquale Perrone-Filardi; Mario Petretta; Alberto Cuocolo
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-04-20       Impact factor: 9.236

6.  Higher event rate in patients with known CAD despite a normal myocardial perfusion scan.

Authors:  Maseeh Uz Zaman; Nosheen Fatima; Unaiza Zaman; Areeba Zaman; Dad J Balcoh; S Zahed Rasheed
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2014-06

7.  12-Year outcome after normal myocardial perfusion SPECT in patients with known coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Machiel J M Ottenhof; Marisa C G Tjong Joe Wai; Hendrik J Boiten; Rebecca S Korbee; Roelf Valkema; Ron T van Domburg; Arend F L Schinkel
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2013-08-03       Impact factor: 5.952

8.  Rise and fall, and provisional rebirth of exercise stress testing at the dawn of the third millennium.

Authors:  Mario Petretta
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 9.  Non-invasive Ischaemia Testing in Patients With Prior Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: Technical Challenges, Limitations, and Future Directions.

Authors:  Andreas Seraphim; Kristopher D Knott; Joao B Augusto; Katia Menacho; Sara Tyebally; Benjamin Dowsing; Sanjeev Bhattacharyya; Leon J Menezes; Daniel A Jones; Rakesh Uppal; James C Moon; Charlotte Manisty
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2021-12-23

10.  Comparing the Prognostic Value of Stress Myocardial Perfusion Imaging by Conventional and Cadmium-Zinc Telluride Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography through a Machine Learning Approach.

Authors:  Valeria Cantoni; Roberta Green; Carlo Ricciardi; Roberta Assante; Leandro Donisi; Emilia Zampella; Giuseppe Cesarelli; Carmela Nappi; Vincenzo Sannino; Valeria Gaudieri; Teresa Mannarino; Andrea Genova; Giovanni De Simini; Alessia Giordano; Adriana D'Antonio; Wanda Acampa; Mario Petretta; Alberto Cuocolo
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2021-10-16       Impact factor: 2.238

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.