Literature DB >> 18603003

Bayesian deconvolution of [corrected] fMRI data using bilinear dynamical systems.

Salima Makni1, Christian Beckmann, Steve Smith, Mark Woolrich.   

Abstract

In Penny et al. [Penny, W., Ghahramani, Z., Friston, K.J. 2005. Bilinear dynamical systems. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 360(1457) 983-993], a particular case of the Linear Dynamical Systems (LDSs) was used to model the dynamic behavior of the BOLD response in functional MRI. This state-space model, called bilinear dynamical system (BDS), is used to deconvolve the fMRI time series in order to estimate the neuronal response induced by the different stimuli of the experimental paradigm. The BDS model parameters are estimated using an expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm proposed by Ghahramani and Hinton [Ghahramani, Z., Hinton, G.E. 1996. Parameter Estimation for Linear Dynamical Systems. Technical Report, Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto]. In this paper we introduce modifications to the BDS model in order to explicitly model the spatial variations of the haemodynamic response function (HRF) in the brain using a non-parametric approach. While in Penny et al. [Penny, W., Ghahramani, Z., Friston, K.J. 2005. Bilinear dynamical systems. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 360(1457) 983-993] the relationship between neuronal activation and fMRI signals is formulated as a first-order convolution with a kernel expansion using basis functions (typically two or three), in this paper, we argue in favor of a spatially adaptive GLM in which a local non-parametric estimation of the HRF is performed. Furthermore, in order to overcome the overfitting problem typically associated with simple EM estimates, we propose a full Variational Bayes (VB) solution to infer the BDS model parameters. We demonstrate the usefulness of our model which is able to estimate both the neuronal activity and the haemodynamic response function in every voxel of the brain. We first examine the behavior of this approach when applied to simulated data with different temporal and noise features. As an example we will show how this method can be used to improve interpretability of estimates from an independent component analysis (ICA) analysis of fMRI data. We finally demonstrate its use on real fMRI data in one slice of the brain.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18603003     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.05.052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  9 in total

1.  Fast joint detection-estimation of evoked brain activity in event-related FMRI using a variational approach.

Authors:  Lotfi Chaari; Thomas Vincent; Florence Forbes; Michel Dojat; Philippe Ciuciu
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2012-10-19       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  State-space models of mental processes from fMRI.

Authors:  Firdaus Janoos; Shantanu Singh; Raghu Machiraju; William M Wells; Istvan A Mórocz
Journal:  Inf Process Med Imaging       Date:  2011

3.  Multivariate dynamical systems models for estimating causal interactions in fMRI.

Authors:  Srikanth Ryali; Kaustubh Supekar; Tianwen Chen; Vinod Menon
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-09-25       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  On consciousness, resting state fMRI, and neurodynamics.

Authors:  Arvid Lundervold
Journal:  Nonlinear Biomed Phys       Date:  2010-06-03

5.  State-space analysis of working memory in schizophrenia: an fBIRN study.

Authors:  Firdaus Janoos; Gregory Brown; Istvan A Mórocz; William M Wells
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2012-12-29       Impact factor: 2.500

6.  Effective Connectivity Modeling for fMRI: Six Issues and Possible Solutions Using Linear Dynamic Systems.

Authors:  Jason F Smith; Ajay Pillai; Kewei Chen; Barry Horwitz
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2012-01-18

7.  Variational Bayesian causal connectivity analysis for fMRI.

Authors:  Martin Luessi; S Derin Babacan; Rafael Molina; James R Booth; Aggelos K Katsaggelos
Journal:  Front Neuroinform       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 4.081

8.  Psychophysiological Interactions in a Visual Checkerboard Task: Reproducibility, Reliability, and the Effects of Deconvolution.

Authors:  Xin Di; Bharat B Biswal
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 4.677

9.  Identifying effective connectivity parameters in simulated fMRI: a direct comparison of switching linear dynamic system, stochastic dynamic causal, and multivariate autoregressive models.

Authors:  Jason F Smith; Kewei Chen; Ajay S Pillai; Barry Horwitz
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 4.677

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.