Literature DB >> 18602748

Does this band make sense? Limits to expression based cancer studies.

Timothy K Williams1, Charles J Yeo, Jonathan Brody.   

Abstract

Cancer researchers commonly employ reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for gene expression analysis of cancer cells. While this technique is facile and reproducible, it is not without limitations. The human genome contains abundant nearly identical sequences (e.g. pseudogenes) to mRNA transcript sequences, which amplify when performing RT-PCR on samples with even trace amounts of genomic DNA. Such sequences include housekeeping transcripts such as beta-actin and GAPDH. This is also true for numerous gene products whose expression is altered in disease states such as cancer (e.g. pp32). Moreover, we describe that amplification of undesirable sequences is not simply avoided by designing primers spanning multiple exons. We also found that template-specific reverse transcriptase reactions lack the specificity necessary to definitively determine the sense or anti-sense orientation of an mRNA transcript. Given the above mentioned caveats and limitations of expression analysis studies, we encourage cancer investigators to test for the existence of intronless genomic sequences that are similar to the specific transcript of the gene being studied. Further, RNA samples should be completely genomic DNA-free prior to performing RT-PCR based assays. Finally, to ensure reliability of RT-PCR or array results, we recommend not utilizing the widely accepted loading controls, GAPDH and/or beta-actin.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18602748     DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2008.05.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Lett        ISSN: 0304-3835            Impact factor:   8.679


  6 in total

1.  HRT Atlas v1.0 database: redefining human and mouse housekeeping genes and candidate reference transcripts by mining massive RNA-seq datasets.

Authors:  Bidossessi Wilfried Hounkpe; Francine Chenou; Franciele de Lima; Erich Vinicius De Paula
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  pp32 (ANP32A) expression inhibits pancreatic cancer cell growth and induces gemcitabine resistance by disrupting HuR binding to mRNAs.

Authors:  Timothy K Williams; Christina L Costantino; Nikolai A Bildzukewicz; Nathan G Richards; David W Rittenhouse; Lisa Einstein; Joseph A Cozzitorto; Judith C Keen; Abhijit Dasgupta; Myriam Gorospe; Gregory E Gonye; Charles J Yeo; Agnieszka K Witkiewicz; Jonathan R Brody
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-11-29       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Pseudogenes as weaknesses of ACTB (Actb) and GAPDH (Gapdh) used as reference genes in reverse transcription and polymerase chain reactions.

Authors:  Yuan Sun; Yan Li; Dianzhong Luo; D Joshua Liao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Comprehensive analysis of LDHAP5 pseudogene expression and potential pathogenesis in ovarian serous cystadenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Shitong Lin; Yifan Meng; Canhui Cao; Ping Wu; Peipei Gao; Wenhua Zhi; Ting Peng; Peng Wu
Journal:  Cancer Cell Int       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 5.722

5.  RAB6C is an independent prognostic factor of estrogen receptor-positive/progesterone receptor-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Helena Fohlin; Tove Bekkhus; Josefine Sandström; Tommy Fornander; Bo Nordenskjöld; John Carstensen; Olle Stål
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 6.  Re-recognition of pseudogenes: From molecular to clinical applications.

Authors:  Xu Chen; Lin Wan; Wei Wang; Wen-Jin Xi; An-Gang Yang; Tao Wang
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 11.556

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.