Literature DB >> 18602672

Collecting duct carcinoma of the kidney: an immunohistochemical evaluation of the use of antibodies for differential diagnosis.

Naohito Kobayashi1, Osamu Matsuzaki, Sumiko Shirai, Ichiro Aoki, Masahiro Yao, Yoji Nagashima.   

Abstract

Collecting duct carcinoma is a highly aggressive renal epithelial malignancy, although it accounts for less than 1% of the incidence of renal epithelial neoplasms. Differential diagnoses between collecting duct carcinoma, pelvic urothelial carcinoma with marked invasion to the renal parenchyma (invasive urothelial carcinoma), and papillary renal cell carcinoma is often challenging. In our current study, we examined the utility of using commercially available antibodies, in conjunction with lectin histochemistry, for such differential diagnoses. We examined 17 cases of collecting duct carcinoma, 10 cases of invasive urothelial carcinoma and 15 cases of papillary renal cell carcinoma (type 1, 6 cases; type 2, 9 cases) in these evaluations. Our results indicated that Ulex europaeus agglutinin 1, E-cadherin, and c-KIT were frequently positive in collecting duct carcinoma and invasive urothelial carcinoma, in comparison with papillary renal cell carcinoma, which had negative results for CD10 and alpha-methylacyl CoA racemase. We found, however, that collecting duct carcinoma showed positivity for high-molecular-weight cytokeratin and low-molecular-weight cytokeratin at a low frequency compared with invasive urothelial carcinoma, and that these distinctions need further careful evaluation. In addition, high-molecular-weight cytokeratin positivity was not a reliable marker for collecting duct carcinoma. We conclude that Ulex europaeus agglutinin 1 reactivity and positivity for E-cadherin and c-KIT are effective in distinguishing collecting duct carcinoma from papillary renal cell carcinoma, and that negative results for alpha-methylacyl CoA racemase and CD10 are potentially useful hallmarks of this distinction also. In contrast, a differential diagnosis for collecting duct carcinoma and invasive urothelial carcinoma will require careful examination of multiple routinely stained specimens, particularly in cases of in situ neoplastic lesions in the pelvic mucosa.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18602672     DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2007.11.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Pathol        ISSN: 0046-8177            Impact factor:   3.466


  17 in total

Review 1.  Endothelial progenitor cells: quo vadis?

Authors:  Matthew R Richardson; Mervin C Yoder
Journal:  J Mol Cell Cardiol       Date:  2010-07-29       Impact factor: 5.000

Review 2.  Management of Atypical Renal Cell Carcinomas.

Authors:  Bobby C Liaw; Reza Mehrazin; Charles Baker; John P Sfakianos; Che-Kai Tsao
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2017-09-14

Review 3.  Correlating Preoperative Imaging with Histologic Subtypes of Renal Cell Carcinoma and Common Mimickers.

Authors:  Jennifer Gordetsky; Jessica Zarzour
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 3.092

4.  PAX8 (+)/p63 (-) immunostaining pattern in renal collecting duct carcinoma (CDC): a useful immunoprofile in the differential diagnosis of CDC versus urothelial carcinoma of upper urinary tract.

Authors:  Roula Albadine; Luciana Schultz; Peter Illei; Dilek Ertoy; Jessica Hicks; Rajni Sharma; Jonathan I Epstein; George J Netto
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 6.394

5.  Effect of collecting duct histology on renal cell cancer outcome.

Authors:  Jonathan L Wright; Michael C Risk; James Hotaling; Daniel W Lin
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 6.  Recent classification of renal epithelial tumors.

Authors:  Naoto Kuroda; Azusa Tanaka
Journal:  Med Mol Morphol       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 2.309

7.  Multidetector CT imaging features of invasive renal parenchyma urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Qingqiang Zhu; Wenrong Zhu; Jingtao Wu; Wenxin Chen
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Management of renal collecting duct carcinoma: a systematic review and the McMaster experience.

Authors:  S Dason; C Allard; A Sheridan-Jonah; J Gill; H Jamshaid; T Aziz; B Kajal; A Kapoor
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 9.  [Characterization of different renal cell carcinoma entities].

Authors:  N J Rupp; H Moch
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 0.639

10.  A collecting duct carcinoma producing carcinoembryonic antigen and Ca-125 in a 29-year-old woman.

Authors:  Nikolaos Tsoukalas; Ioannis D Kostakis; Maria Tolia; Dimitrios Tryfonopoulos; Georgios Lypas; Christos Panopoulos; Vasileios Barbounis; Georgios Koumakis; Anna Efremidis
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2014-02-15       Impact factor: 2.370

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.