OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the reliability of panoramic radiograph (PR) for carotid artery atheroma detection, by comparing its results with the carotid-vertebral digital subtraction angiography (DSA) findings, as well as with the detected calcium deposition in the carotid plaques, which were surgically resected, using direct radiographs. STUDY DESIGN: Forty consecutive patients suffering from carotid artery atherosclerotic occlusive disease confirmed by preoperative DSA, fulfilling the criteria for carotid endarterectomy, were operated on. Preoperatively, all of the patients had undergone PR, while postoperatively all of the surgically resected carotid plaques were radiographed using radiographic films and submitted to histologic examination. Compared with the DSA and the radiographic film findings, the PR results were classified as: 1) true-positive; 2) true-negative; 3) false-positive; or 4) false-negative. RESULTS: Panoramic radiograph has low sensitivity and specificity compared with the DSA findings and the direct radiographs results. However, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 100% per patient as well as for luminal stenosis >80% was documented. CONCLUSION: Even in the subgroup of patients who fulfill the criteria for carotid endarterectomy, PR has a low sensitivity and specificity; therefore, it cannot be considered to be a useful screening tool for atheroma detection in the general dental population. However, the 100% PPV per patient and for luminal stenosis >80%, indicates that positive calcification PR findings at the C(3)-C(4) region are highly suggestive for carotid artery atherosclerotic occlusive disease. Therefore, especially asymptomatic patients should be referred for further examination.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the reliability of panoramic radiograph (PR) for carotid artery atheroma detection, by comparing its results with the carotid-vertebral digital subtraction angiography (DSA) findings, as well as with the detected calcium deposition in the carotid plaques, which were surgically resected, using direct radiographs. STUDY DESIGN: Forty consecutive patients suffering from carotid artery atherosclerotic occlusive disease confirmed by preoperative DSA, fulfilling the criteria for carotid endarterectomy, were operated on. Preoperatively, all of the patients had undergone PR, while postoperatively all of the surgically resected carotid plaques were radiographed using radiographic films and submitted to histologic examination. Compared with the DSA and the radiographic film findings, the PR results were classified as: 1) true-positive; 2) true-negative; 3) false-positive; or 4) false-negative. RESULTS: Panoramic radiograph has low sensitivity and specificity compared with the DSA findings and the direct radiographs results. However, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 100% per patient as well as for luminal stenosis >80% was documented. CONCLUSION: Even in the subgroup of patients who fulfill the criteria for carotid endarterectomy, PR has a low sensitivity and specificity; therefore, it cannot be considered to be a useful screening tool for atheroma detection in the general dental population. However, the 100% PPV per patient and for luminal stenosis >80%, indicates that positive calcification PR findings at the C(3)-C(4) region are highly suggestive for carotid artery atherosclerotic occlusive disease. Therefore, especially asymptomatic patients should be referred for further examination.
Authors: Maria Garoff; Jan Ahlqvist; Eva Levring Jäghagen; Elias Johansson; Per Wester Journal: Dentomaxillofac Radiol Date: 2016-05-10 Impact factor: 2.419