Literature DB >> 18602180

Risk profiles of pork and poultry meat and risk ratings of various pathogen/product combinations.

M Mataragas1, P N Skandamis, E H Drosinos.   

Abstract

Risk profiles of pork and poultry meat were carried out using an Excel-based software program, Risk Ranger. It is a semi-quantitative risk estimator answering various questions relating to the probability of exposure to a hazard, susceptibility of the population of interest, severity of the illness caused by the hazard if present and probability of food containing an infectious dose. Therefore, qualitative and quantitative inputs were used to estimate and rank the risk of various hazards/food combinations. Risk scores provided by the tool were characterized as low, medium and high. Also, health risk was estimated separately, where needed, for low and high risk populations. Low risk scores were obtained for Salmonella spp., Listeria monocytogenes and enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli (EHEC) for low risk population. High risk scores were obtained for hepatitis E virus (HEV) in raw pork products (both low and high risk populations). Moderate risk scores for Salmonella spp. and L. monocytogenes in processed pork or poultry-meat products (ready-to-eat or to be reheated) and partially cooked pork products were also obtained (low risk population). Scores for Staphylococcus aureus, Clostridium perfringens and Bacillus cereus and various product types were mostly in the "medium" risk category, except for S. aureus/ready-to-eat pork products able to support growth of the organism, which fell into the high risk category. Campylobacter spp. gave moderate risk scores with one exception (raw poultry products), whereas Y. enterocolitica showed combinations of low risk and few of medium risk. High risk pathogen/product combinations identified were: 1) temperature abused, ready-to-eat pork and/or poultry-meat products with extended shelf life and cross-contaminated by L. monocytogenes (high risk population), EHEC (high risk population) or S. aureus (all population), 2) partially cooked or processed intended to be reheated pork products cross-contaminated by L. monocytogenes, served undercooked and receiving improper cooling or reheating (high risk population), and 3) all people consuming undercooked meals cross-contaminated with Campylobacter spp. (e.g. from raw poultry and raw poultry-meat products) and HEV (e.g. from raw pork and raw pork-meat products). Salmonellae gave high risk scores in all food categories (except preserved meat products) for high risk population. Preserved meats (mainly pork) such as dry fermented sausages gave low risk scores. Only Salmonella spp., L. monocytogenes and E. coli EHEC gave moderate risk ratings in case of ingredients likely to be contaminated at an early stage of processing (e.g. animal at slaughter) and inadequate fermentation process. These results may constitute a source of information for hazard assessment during application of a Food Safety Management System.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18602180     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2008.05.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol        ISSN: 0168-1605            Impact factor:   5.277


  15 in total

1.  Growth behavior comparison of Listeria monocytogenes between Type strains and beef isolates in raw beef.

Authors:  So-Yeon Lee; Ki-Hyun Kwon; Changhoon Chai; Se-Wook Oh
Journal:  Food Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2017-11-30       Impact factor: 2.391

Review 2.  Postharvest intervention technologies for safety enhancement of meat and meat based products; a critical review.

Authors:  Muhammad Sohaib; Faqir Muhammad Anjum; Muhammad Sajid Arshad; Ubaid Ur Rahman
Journal:  J Food Sci Technol       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 2.701

3.  Quantitative risk assessment of human salmonellosis in the smallholder pig value chains in urban of Vietnam.

Authors:  Sinh Dang-Xuan; Hung Nguyen-Viet; Fred Unger; Phuc Pham-Duc; Delia Grace; Ngan Tran-Thi; Max Barot; Ngoc Pham-Thi; Kohei Makita
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 3.380

4.  Hidden danger: the raw facts about hepatitis E virus.

Authors:  Robert H Purcell; Suzanne U Emerson
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 5.226

5.  Application of Quantitative Microbiology and Challenge Tests to Reach a Suggested Food Safety Objective in a Middle Eastern-Style Ready-to-Cook Chicken Product.

Authors:  Tareq M Osaili; Vasiliki Giatrakou; Athina Ntzimani; Maria Tsiraki; Ioannis N Savvaidis
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2022-06-27

6.  Salmonella in meats, water, fruit and vegetables as disclosed from testing undertaken by Food Business Operators in Ireland from 2005 to 2009.

Authors:  Sharon Duggan; Emily Jordan; Montserrat Gutierrez; Gaye Barrett; Tony O'Brien; Darren Hand; Kevin Kenny; June Fanning; Nola Leonard; John Egan
Journal:  Ir Vet J       Date:  2012-09-22       Impact factor: 2.146

7.  Effect of rosemary essential oil and modified-atmosphere packaging (MAP) on meat quality and survival of pathogens in poultry fillets.

Authors:  Tolga Kahraman; Ghassan Issa; Enver Baris Bingol; Beren Basaran Kahraman; Emek Dumen
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 2.476

8.  Risk factors and spatial distribution of extended spectrum β-lactamase-producing- Escherichia coli at retail poultry meat markets in Malaysia: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  A B Aliyu; A A Saleha; A Jalila; Z Zunita
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  Sampling and Homogenization Strategies Significantly Influence the Detection of Foodborne Pathogens in Meat.

Authors:  Alexander Rohde; Jens Andre Hammerl; Bernd Appel; Ralf Dieckmann; Sascha Al Dahouk
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-10-11       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Food-safety hazards in the pork chain in Nagaland, North East India: implications for human health.

Authors:  Anna Sophie Fahrion; Lanu Jamir; Kenivole Richa; Sonuwara Begum; Vilatuo Rutsa; Simon Ao; Varijaksha P Padmakumar; Ram Pratim Deka; Delia Grace
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2013-12-24       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.