Literature DB >> 1860216

Impact of impinging wall jet on color Doppler quantification of mitral regurgitation.

C G Chen1, J D Thomas, J Anconina, P Harrigan, L Mueller, M H Picard, R A Levine, A E Weyman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In clinical color Doppler examinations, mitral regurgitant jets are often observed to impinge on the left atrial wall immediately beyond the mitral valve. In accordance with fluid dynamics theory, we hypothesized that a jet impinging on a wall would lose momentum more rapidly, undergo spatial distortion, and thus have a different observed jet area from that of a free jet with an identical flow rate. METHODS AND
RESULTS: To test this hypothesis in vivo, we studied 44 patients with mitral regurgitation--30 with centrally directed free jets and 14 with eccentrically directed impinging wall jets. Maximal color jet areas (cm2) (with and without correction for left atrial size) were correlated with mitral regurgitant volumes, flow rates, and fractions derived from pulsed Doppler mitral and aortic forward flows. The groups were compared by analysis of covariance. Mean +/- SD mitral regurgitant fraction, regurgitant volume, and mean flow rate averaged 37 +/- 17%, 3.06 +/- 2.65 l/min, and 147 +/- 118 ml/sec, respectively. The maximal jet area from color Doppler imaging correlated relatively well with the mitral regurgitant fraction in the patients with free mitral regurgitant jets (r = 0.74, p less than 0.0001) but poorly in the patients with impinging wall jets (r = 0.42, p = NS). Although the mitral regurgitant fraction was larger (p less than 0.05) in patients with wall jets (44 +/- 20%) than in those with free jets (33 +/- 15%), the maximal jet area was significantly smaller (4.78 +/- 2.87 cm2 for wall jets versus 9.17 +/- 6.45 cm2 for free jets, p less than 0.01). For the same regurgitant fraction, wall jets were only approximately 40% of the size of a corresponding free jet, a difference confirmed by analysis of covariance (p less than 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with mitral regurgitation frequently have jets that impinge on the left atrial wall close to the mitral valve. Such impinging wall jets are less predictable and usually have much smaller color Doppler areas in conventional echocardiographic views than do free jets of similar regurgitant severity. Jet morphology should be considered in the semiquantitative interpretation of mitral regurgitation by Doppler color flow mapping. Future studies of the three-dimensional morphology of wall jets may aid in their assessment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1860216     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.84.2.712

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  23 in total

Review 1.  [Echocardiographic evaluation in unoperated congenital heart disease in adults].

Authors:  A Geibel
Journal:  Herz       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 1.443

2.  Noninvasive Cardiac Imaging in Chest Pain Syndromes.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 3.  Doppler echocardiographic assessment of valvar regurgitation.

Authors:  James D Thomas
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 4.  Assessment of mitral regurgitation.

Authors:  T Irvine; X K Li; D J Sahn; A Kenny
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 5.994

5.  Mechanisms and predictors of mitral regurgitation after high-risk myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Alessandra Meris; Maria Amigoni; Anil Verma; Jens Jakob Thune; Lars Køber; Eric Velazquez; John J V McMurray; Marc A Pfeffer; Robert Califf; Robert A Levine; Scott D Solomon
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2012-02-04       Impact factor: 5.251

Review 6.  A practical approach to the quantification of valvular regurgitation.

Authors:  Ron Jacob; William J Stewart
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.931

7.  Assessment of functional anatomy of the mitral valve in patients with mitral regurgitation with cine magnetic resonance imaging: comparison with transesophageal echocardiography and surgical results.

Authors:  A Stork; O Franzen; H Ruschewski; C Detter; K Müllerleile; P M Bansmann; G Adam; G K Lund
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-06-05       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 8.  An introduction to transoesophageal echocardiography: I. Basic principles.

Authors:  F Béïque; D Joffe; S Kleiman
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 5.063

9.  Cardiac structure and function and prognosis in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: findings from the echocardiographic study of the Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure with an Aldosterone Antagonist (TOPCAT) Trial.

Authors:  Amil M Shah; Brian Claggett; Nancy K Sweitzer; Sanjiv J Shah; Inder S Anand; Eileen O'Meara; Akshay S Desai; John F Heitner; Guichu Li; James Fang; Jean Rouleau; Michael R Zile; Valetin Markov; Vyacheslav Ryabov; Gilmar Reis; Susan F Assmann; Sonja M McKinlay; Bertram Pitt; Marc A Pfeffer; Scott D Solomon
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 8.790

Review 10.  Valvular heart disease: what does cardiovascular MRI add?

Authors:  Pier Giorgio Masci; Steven Dymarkowski; Jan Bogaert
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-08-29       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.