Literature DB >> 18601934

Differential feeding responses to central alpha-melanocyte stimulating hormone in genetically low and high body weight selected lines of chickens.

Mark A Cline1, Wint Nandar, Christie Bowden, Pyae Phyo Hein, D Michael Denbow, Paul B Siegel.   

Abstract

This study was conducted to compare the effects of central alpha-MSH, a potent anorexigenic signal, in lines of chickens that have undergone long-term divergent selection for low (LWS) or high (HWS) body weight. Chicks from both lines were centrally injected with 0, 24, 120 or 600 pmol alpha-MSH and feed and water intake were concurrently measured thereafter for a total of 180 min. The LWS line responded to all doses of alpha-MSH with a similar potent decrease in feed intake at all observation times. The HWS line only responded to 600 pmol alpha-MSH with decreased feed intake. alpha-MSH did not influence water intake in either line. To determine if differential hypothalamic signaling was associated with the anorexigenic effect, c-Fos immunoreactivity was measured in appetite-related hypothalamic nuclei after 600 pmol central alpha-MSH injections. c-Fos immunoreactivity was increased in the dorsomedial hypothalamus, paraventricular nucleus (PVN) and ventromedial hypothalamus in both lines after alpha-MSH; however, the magnitude of increase was greater in LWS than in HWS chicks at the PVN (136% vs. 47% increase over controls, respectively). Based on behavior observations, the number of feeding and exploratory pecks is decreased with greater magnitude after alpha-MSH in the LWS line. Additionally, alpha-MSH was associated with increased deep rest in both lines, and may be a secondary effect to reduced ingestion. These data support that the LWS line has a lower threshold for the anorexigenic effect of central alpha-MSH while in the HWS line this threshold is higher, and that this difference may be associated with differential hypothalamic signaling. Genetic variation exists in the threshold of anorexigenic response for central alpha-MSH in LWS and HWS lines of chickens with possible implications to other species including humans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18601934     DOI: 10.1016/j.lfs.2008.06.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Life Sci        ISSN: 0024-3205            Impact factor:   5.037


  8 in total

1.  Hypothalamic differences in expression of genes involved in monoamine synthesis and signaling pathways after insulin injection in chickens from lines selected for high and low body weight.

Authors:  Wei Zhang; Sungwon Kim; Robert Settlage; Wyatt McMahon; Lindsay H Sumners; Paul B Siegel; Benjamin J Dorshorst; Mark A Cline; Elizabeth R Gilbert
Journal:  Neurogenetics       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 2.660

2.  Chickens from lines selected for high and low body weight show differences in fatty acid oxidation efficiency and metabolic flexibility in skeletal muscle and white adipose tissue.

Authors:  S Zhang; R P McMillan; M W Hulver; P B Siegel; L H Sumners; W Zhang; M A Cline; E R Gilbert
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2014-01-20       Impact factor: 5.095

3.  Differentially expressed genes in hypothalamus in relation to genomic regions under selection in two chicken lines resulting from divergent selection for high or low body weight.

Authors:  Sojeong Ka; Frank W Albert; D Michael Denbow; Svante Pääbo; Paul B Siegel; Leif Andersson; Finn Hallböök
Journal:  Neurogenetics       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 2.660

4.  The melanocortin-4 receptor: physiology, pharmacology, and pathophysiology.

Authors:  Ya-Xiong Tao
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 19.871

5.  Transcriptional and pathway analysis in the hypothalamus of newly hatched chicks during fasting and delayed feeding.

Authors:  Stacy E Higgins; Laura E Ellestad; Nares Trakooljul; Fiona McCarthy; Jason Saliba; Larry A Cogburn; Tom E Porter
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2010-03-09       Impact factor: 3.969

Review 6.  Neuropeptide Control of Feeding Behavior in Birds and Its Difference with Mammals.

Authors:  Tetsuya Tachibana; Kazuyoshi Tsutsui
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 4.677

Review 7.  Regulation of Agouti-Related Protein and Pro-Opiomelanocortin Gene Expression in the Avian Arcuate Nucleus.

Authors:  Timothy Boswell; Ian C Dunn
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 5.555

8.  The physiological and neuroendocrine correlates of hunger in the Red Junglefowl (Gallus gallus).

Authors:  J J Lees; C Lindholm; P Batakis; M Busscher; J Altimiras
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.