Literature DB >> 18601667

Use of the Optomap with lid retraction and its sensitivity and specificity.

Sam C K Cheng1, Maurice K H Yap, Ernest Goldschmidt, Peter G Swann, Larry H Y Ng, Carly S Y Lam.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Optomap uses the ultra-wide field scanning laser ophthalmoscopy to provide retinal examination. It permits fundus examination without the use of a mydriatic, which is more comfortable for the patients. This paper determines the sensitivity and specificity of the Optomap for detecting retinal signs under non-mydriatic conditions.
METHODS: Fifty-four eyes identified with retinal/choroidal signs and eight normal eyes were recruited from 31 Hong Kong Chinese subjects. Photo-documentation of fundal changes was obtained with the Optomap under non-mydriatic conditions before a dilated fundus examination by a clinician using standard procedures. The eyelid was retracted using a cotton bud when necessary. Dilated fundus examinations were performed by another clinician using binocular indirect ophthalmoscopy and slitlamp biomicroscopy with a fundus lens. The Optomap images were evaluated by four other investigators under masked condition. The International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision (ICD-9-CM) was adopted for recording retinal features. Screening results were compared with those obtained using the dilated fundus examination as the gold standard.
RESULTS: The cotton bud method for eyelid retraction showed an improvement in the area of retina that could be visualised. The sensitivity and specificity of the Optomap averaged 76.4 and 71.9 per cent, respectively. Some fundal signs were missed by all observers in the Optomap but not with the biomicroscope. These included white-without-pressure, lattice degeneration, paramacular drusen and pigmentary changes at central fundus.
CONCLUSION: Optomap serves as a reliable screening tool for fundus examination especially because it covers a much wider area of the peripheral retina than other digital instruments for fundus photography.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18601667     DOI: 10.1111/j.1444-0938.2007.00231.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Exp Optom        ISSN: 0816-4622            Impact factor:   2.742


  6 in total

1.  Combined 60° Wide-Field Choroidal Thickness Maps and High-Definition En Face Vasculature Visualization Using Swept-Source Megahertz OCT at 1050 nm.

Authors:  Kathrin J Mohler; Wolfgang Draxinger; Thomas Klein; Jan Philip Kolb; Wolfgang Wieser; Christos Haritoglou; Anselm Kampik; James G Fujimoto; Aljoscha S Neubauer; Robert Huber; Armin Wolf
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Comparison of image-assisted versus traditional fundus examination.

Authors:  Kristen Brown; Jeanette M Sewell; Clement Trempe; Tunde Peto; Thomas G Travison
Journal:  Eye Brain       Date:  2013-02-13

3.  Data quality and clinical decision-making: do we trust machines blindly?

Authors:  Konrad Pesudovs; Raymond A Applegate
Journal:  Clin Exp Optom       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 2.742

4.  Ultra-widefield fundus fluorescein angiography in the diagnosis and management of retinal vasculitis.

Authors:  N P Jones; A Sala-Puigdollers; P E Stanga
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 3.775

5.  Comparison of Optomap ultrawide-field imaging versus slit-lamp biomicroscopy for assessment of diabetic retinopathy in a real-life clinic.

Authors:  Robert M J Purbrick; Shahrnaz Izadi; Ankur Gupta; N Victor Chong
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-07-29

6.  Combined in-depth, 3D, en face imaging of the optic disc, optic disc pits and optic disc pit maculopathy using swept-source megahertz OCT at 1050 nm.

Authors:  Josef Maertz; Jan Philip Kolb; Thomas Klein; Kathrin J Mohler; Matthias Eibl; Wolfgang Wieser; Robert Huber; Siegfried Priglinger; Armin Wolf
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 3.117

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.