Literature DB >> 18601529

Prolonged irradiation of enhanced cyan fluorescent protein or Cerulean can invalidate Forster resonance energy transfer measurements.

Birgit Hoffmann1, Thomas Zimmer, Nikolaj Klöcker, Laimonas Kelbauskas, Karsten König, Klaus Benndorf, Christoph Biskup.   

Abstract

Since its discovery, green fluorescent protein (GFP) and its variants have proven to be a good and convenient fluorescent label for proteins: GFP and other visible fluorescent proteins (VFPs) can be fused selectively to the protein of interest by simple cloning techniques and develop fluorescence without additional cofactors. Among the steadily growing collection of VFPs, several pairs can be chosen that can serve as donor and acceptor fluorophores in Forster resonance energy transfer (FRET) experiments. Among them, the cyan fluorescent proteins (ECFP/Cerulean) and the enhanced yellow fluorescent protein (EYFP) are most commonly used. We show that ECFP and Cerulean have some disadvantages despite their common use: Upon irradiation with light intensities that are commonly used for intensity- and lifetime-based FRET measurements, both the fluorescence intensity and the fluorescence lifetime of ECFP and Cerulean decrease. This can hamper both intensity- and lifetime-based FRET measurements and emphasizes the need for control measurements to exclude these artifacts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18601529     DOI: 10.1117/1.2937829

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Opt        ISSN: 1083-3668            Impact factor:   3.170


  6 in total

1.  Physiological fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy improves Förster resonance energy transfer detection in living cells.

Authors:  Ching-Wei Chang; Mei Wu; Sofia D Merajver; Mary-Ann Mycek
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2009 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.170

2.  Combined bimolecular fluorescence complementation and Forster resonance energy transfer reveals ternary SNARE complex formation in living plant cells.

Authors:  Mark Kwaaitaal; Nana F Keinath; Simone Pajonk; Christoph Biskup; Ralph Panstruga
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 8.340

3.  Photobleaching-based quantitative analysis of fluorescence resonance energy transfer inside single living cell.

Authors:  Longxiang Wang; Tongsheng Chen; Junle Qu; Xunbin Wei
Journal:  J Fluoresc       Date:  2009-07-09       Impact factor: 2.217

Review 4.  Single cell optical imaging and spectroscopy.

Authors:  Anthony S Stender; Kyle Marchuk; Chang Liu; Suzanne Sander; Matthew W Meyer; Emily A Smith; Bhanu Neupane; Gufeng Wang; Junjie Li; Ji-Xin Cheng; Bo Huang; Ning Fang
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 60.622

5.  Intravital FRET: Probing Cellular and Tissue Function in Vivo.

Authors:  Helena Radbruch; Daniel Bremer; Ronja Mothes; Robert Günther; Jan Leo Rinnenthal; Julian Pohlan; Carolin Ulbricht; Anja E Hauser; Raluca Niesner
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  Parallelized TCSPC for dynamic intravital fluorescence lifetime imaging: quantifying neuronal dysfunction in neuroinflammation.

Authors:  Jan Leo Rinnenthal; Christian Börnchen; Helena Radbruch; Volker Andresen; Agata Mossakowski; Volker Siffrin; Thomas Seelemann; Heinrich Spiecker; Ingrid Moll; Josephine Herz; Anja E Hauser; Frauke Zipp; Martin J Behne; Raluca Niesner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.