Literature DB >> 18601173

Factors affecting microbial sulfate reduction by Desulfovibrio desulfuricans in continuous culture: limiting nutrients and sulfide concentration.

S Okabe1, P H Nielsen, W G Charcklis.   

Abstract

The effects of sulfate and nitrogen concentrations of the rate and stoichiometry of microbial sulfate reduction were investigated for Desulfovibrio desulfuricans grown on lactate and sulfate in a chemostat at pH 7.0. Maximum specific growth rates (micro(max)), half-saturation coefficients (K(sul)), and cell yield (Y(c/Lac)) of 0.344 +/- 0.007 and 0.352 +/- 0.003 h (-1), 1.8 +/- 0.3 and 1.0 +/- 0.2 mg/L, and 0.020 +/- 0.003 and 0.017 +/- 0.003 g cell/g lactate, respectively, were obtained under sulfate-limiting conditions at 35 degrees C and 43 degrees C. Maintenance energy requirements for D. desulfuricans were significant under sulfate-limiting conditions. The extent of extracellular polymeric substance (EPS) produced was related to the carbon: nitrogen ratio in the medium. EPS production rate increased with decreased nitrogen loading rate. Nitrogen starvation also resulted in decreased cell size of D. desulfuricans. The limiting C : N ratio (w/w) for D. desulfuricans was in the range of 45 : 1 to 120 : 1. Effects of sulfide on microbial sulfate reduction, cell size, and biomass production were also investigated at pH 7.0. Fifty percent inhibition of lactate utilization occurred at a total sulfide concentration of approximately 500 mg/L. The cell size of D. desulfuricans decreased with increasing total sulfide concentration. Sulfide inhibition of D. desulfuricans was observed to be a reversible process. (c) 1992 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Entities:  

Year:  1992        PMID: 18601173     DOI: 10.1002/bit.260400612

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng        ISSN: 0006-3592            Impact factor:   4.530


  10 in total

1.  A bioreactor for growth of sulfate-reducing bacteria: online estimation of specific growth rate and biomass for the deep-sea hydrothermal vent thermophile Thermodesulfatator indicus.

Authors:  Joost Hoek; Donald Canfield; Anna-Louise Reysenbach; Lønsmann Iversen
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2006-04-28       Impact factor: 4.552

Review 2.  Metabolism of sulfate-reducing prokaryotes.

Authors:  T A Hansen
Journal:  Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.271

3.  Storage of oil field-produced waters alters their chemical and microbiological characteristics.

Authors:  Jordan C Hulecki; Julia M Foght; Phillip M Fedorak
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2010-02-27       Impact factor: 3.346

4.  Modeling reduction of uranium U(VI) under variable sulfate concentrations by sulfate-reducing bacteria.

Authors:  J R Spear; L A Figueroa; B D Honeyman
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 5.  Sulfur Cycling and the Intestinal Microbiome.

Authors:  Larry L Barton; Nathaniel L Ritz; Guy D Fauque; Henry C Lin
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  The role of iron in enhancing anaerobic toluene degradation in sulfate-reducing enrichment cultures.

Authors:  H R Beller; M Reinhard
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 4.552

7.  Formation of Large Native Sulfur Deposits Does Not Require Molecular Oxygen.

Authors:  Amanda L Labrado; Benjamin Brunner; Stefano M Bernasconi; Jörn Peckmann
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2019-01-25       Impact factor: 5.640

8.  Microbial Diversity Dynamics in a Methanogenic-Sulfidogenic UASB Reactor.

Authors:  E Fernández-Palacios; Xudong Zhou; Mabel Mora; David Gabriel
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Response to substrate limitation by a marine sulfate-reducing bacterium.

Authors:  Angeliki Marietou; Kasper U Kjeldsen; Clemens Glombitza; Bo Barker Jørgensen
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 10.302

10.  Predicting compositions of microbial communities from stoichiometric models with applications for the biogas process.

Authors:  Sabine Koch; Dirk Benndorf; Karen Fronk; Udo Reichl; Steffen Klamt
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 6.040

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.