Literature DB >> 18600333

Mid to long-term results of open acromioclavicular-joint reconstruction using polydioxansulfate cerclage augmentation.

S Greiner1, J Braunsdorf, C Perka, S Herrmann, S Scheffler.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: There is still controversy about the optimal operative treatment of acromioclavicular (AC)-joint dislocations. However, in the current literature, only few studies are available on mid- to long-term results of different stabilization methods. This retrospective study presents the clinical and radiographical results after open reduction and stabilization of AC-joint dislocations using polydioxanesulfate (PDS) cerclage augmentation.
METHODS: Fifty patients with a mean age of 35 years were treated with open reduction and PDS cerclage augmentation. Rockwood classification showed 44 type V, 5 type III and 1 type IV AC-joint dislocation. The clinical and radiographic follow-up (Constant Score, DASH Score, subjective shoulder value and stress radiographs of the shoulder girdle) were performed postoperatively at an average of 70 months.
RESULTS: Clinical scores were good to excellent with a mean constant score of 91.7 +/- 8.7 points. The mean DASH Score was 5 +/- 8.8 points and the mean subjective shoulder value was 92 +/- 10.7. Radiographically, 80% showed a difference of coracoclavicular distance in comparison to the contralateral side of <5 mm, 14% of 5-10 mm and 6% of >10 mm. Radiographical signs of osteoarthritis were present in 37 and in 6% of all patients also evident during clinical examination. Coracoclavicular calcifications were seen in 68%. Complications were: one superficial wound infection, one extensive coracoclavicular calcification and two complete secondary redislocations.
CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of AC-joint dislocation using PDS cerclage augmentation leads to good to excellent clinical results. However, mid- to long-term follow-up reveals a high incidence of radiographic signs of osteoarthritis of the AC-joint. Whether this is due to the surgical technique and could be reduced using other, more anatomical fixation techniques or whether the injury itself leads to these changes, need to be shown.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18600333     DOI: 10.1007/s00402-008-0688-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg        ISSN: 0936-8051            Impact factor:   3.067


  31 in total

1.  Acromioclavicular and coracoclavicular PDS augmentation for complete AC joint dislocation showed insufficient properties in a cadaver model.

Authors:  Frank Martetschläger; Arne Buchholz; Gunther Sandmann; Sebastian Siebenlist; Stefan Döbele; Alexander Hapfelmeier; Ulrich Stöckle; Peter J Millett; Florian Elser; Andreas Lenich
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Acromioclavicular joint dislocations: coracoclavicular reconstruction with and without additional direct acromioclavicular repair.

Authors:  Lukas Weiser; Jakob V Nüchtern; Kay Sellenschloh; Klaus Püschel; Michael M Morlock; Johannes M Rueger; Michael Hoffmann; Wolfgang Lehmann; Lars G Großterlinden
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-12-19       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Acromioclavicular motion after surgical reconstruction.

Authors:  Pierorazio Motta; Laura Bruno; Alberto Maderni; Piermario Tosco; Umberto Mariotti
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 4.  [Therapy of acute acromioclavicular joint instability. Meta-analysis of arthroscopic/minimally invasive versus open procedures].

Authors:  T Helfen; G Siebenbürger; B Ockert; F Haasters
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.000

5.  The Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute Dislocation of the Acromioclavicular Joint.

Authors:  Frank Martetschläger; Natascha Kraus; Markus Scheibel; Jörg Streich; Arne Venjakob; Dirk Maier
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2019-02-08       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 6.  Comparison of surgical outcomes between fixation with hook plate and loop suspensory fixation for acute unstable acromioclavicular joint dislocation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Alisara Arirachakaran; Manusak Boonard; Peerapong Piyapittayanun; Vajarin Phiphobmongkol; Kornkit Chaijenkij; Jatupon Kongtharvonskul
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2016-06-22

7.  [Arthroscopically assisted stabilization of acute injury to the acromioclavicular joint with the double TightRope™ technique: one-year results].

Authors:  C Gerhardt; N Kraus; S Pauly; M Scheibel
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 8.  Comparison of the outcome of early and delayed surgical treatment of complete acromioclavicular joint dislocation.

Authors:  Tengfei Song; Xu Yan; Tianwen Ye
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Evaluation of coracoclavicular stabilization of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation with multistrand titanium cables.

Authors:  Tianwen Ye; Yueping Ouyang; Aimin Chen
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2013-12-11

10.  [Injuries of the acromioclavicular joint in athletes].

Authors:  N Kraus; M Scheibel
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 0.955

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.