Literature DB >> 18600141

Clinical results of intrapedicular partial pediculectomy for lumbar foraminal stenosis.

Nobutake Ozeki1, Yoichi Aota, Masaaki Uesugi, Kanichiro Kaneko, Hisanori Mihara, Takanori Niimura, Tomoyuki Saito.   

Abstract

DESIGN: A retrospective case study of the use of intrapedicular partial pediculectomy (IPPP) to treat lumbar foraminal stenosis.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical results of lumbar foraminal stenosis treated with IPPP. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: There is no gold standard for the surgical treatment of foraminal stenosis, which occurs in 8% of surgical cases of lumbar degenerative diseases.
METHODS: A total of 26 patients who were followed up for a minimum of 2 years after IPPP for foraminal stenosis, were included in this study. The study group consisted of 20 men and 6 women with an average age at surgery of 63.3 years (range: 42 to 83) and a mean follow-up of 5.5 years (range: 2 to 11). The affected levels were L3/4 in 1 patient, L4/5 in 7, and L5/S1 in 18. Bilateral IPPP at L5/S1 was performed in 2 patients. The clinical results were evaluated according to the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scoring system.
RESULTS: Two patients required revision surgery to correct insufficient decompression. In the remaining 24 patients, the average JOA scores were 6.7 (range: -1 to 10) before surgery, 12.4 (range: 9 to 15) 3 months after surgery, 12.3 (range: 9 to 15) 1 year after surgery, and 11.7 (range: 5 to 15) at the final follow-up. The average recovery rate was 62.1% (range: 40.0% to 81.3%).
CONCLUSIONS: This follow-up study confirms that IPPP affords long-lasting improvements in leg symptoms for patients with lumbar foraminal stenosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18600141     DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e318149e681

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech        ISSN: 1536-0652


  10 in total

1.  Clinical outcomes of microscopic decompression for degenerative lumbar foraminal stenosis: a comparison between patients with and without degenerative lumbar scoliosis.

Authors:  Kentaro Yamada; Hideki Matsuda; Masaharu Nabeta; Hiroshi Habunaga; Akinobu Suzuki; Hiroaki Nakamura
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Unilateral augmented pedicle screw fixation for foraminal stenosis.

Authors:  Jeong-Gyun Kim; Yong-Jun Jin; Sang Ki Chung; Ki-Jeong Kim; Hyun-Jib Kim
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2009-07-31

3.  Comparative observational study of surgical outcomes of lumbar foraminal stenosis using minimally invasive microsurgical extraforaminal decompression alone versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Ho-Joong Kim; Jin-Hwa Jeong; Hyeon-Guk Cho; Bong-Soon Chang; Choon-Ki Lee; Jin S Yeom
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Can unilateral-approach minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion attain indirect contralateral decompression? A preliminary report of 66 MRI analysis.

Authors:  Moon-Chan Kim; Jeong-Uk Park; Woo-Chul Kim; Hong-Seok Lee; Hung-Tae Chung; Moo-Won Kim; Nam-Su Chung
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Extreme lateral interbody fusion for unilateral symptomatic vertical foraminal stenosis.

Authors:  Marjan Alimi; Christoph P Hofstetter; Apostolos J Tsiouris; Eric Elowitz; Roger Härtl
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-18       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Microsurgical extraforaminal decompression of lumbar root canal stenosis.

Authors:  L Papavero; R Kothe
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 1.154

7.  Discrimination between Lumbar Intraspinal Stenosis and Foraminal Stenosis using Diffusion Tensor Imaging Parameters: Preliminary Results.

Authors:  Yawara Eguchi; Seiji Ohtori; Munetaka Suzuki; Yasuhiro Oikawa; Hajime Yamanaka; Hiroshi Tamai; Tatsuya Kobayashi; Sumihisa Orita; Kazuyo Yamauchi; Miyako Suzuki; Yasuchika Aoki; Atsuya Watanabe; Hirohito Kanamoto; Kazuhisa Takahashi
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2016-04-15

8.  Microsurgical Foraminotomy via Wiltse Paraspinal Approach for Foraminal or Extraforaminal Stenosis at L5-S1 Level : Risk Factor Analysis for Poor Outcome.

Authors:  Sung-Ik Cho; Chung-Kee Chough; Shu-Chung Choi; Jin Young Chon
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2016-10-24

9.  Assessment of Clinical Symptoms in Lumbar Foraminal Stenosis Using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire.

Authors:  Yawara Eguchi; Munetaka Suzuki; Hajime Yamanaka; Hiroshi Tamai; Tatsuya Kobayashi; Sumihisa Orita; Kazuyo Yamauchi; Miyako Suzuki; Kazuhide Inage; Hirohito Kanamoto; Koki Abe; Yasuchika Aoki; Masao Koda; Takeo Furuya; Kazuhisa Takahashi; Seiji Ohtori
Journal:  Korean J Spine       Date:  2017-03-31

10.  Percutaneous Stenoscopic Lumbar Decompression with Paramedian Approach for Foraminal/Extraforaminal Lesions.

Authors:  Han Ga Wi Nam; Hyung Suk Kim; Dong Keun Lee; Chun-Kun Park; Kang Taek Lim
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2019-03-26
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.