Literature DB >> 18599743

Reviewing peer review.

Bruce Alberts, Brooks Hanson, Katrina L Kelner.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2008        PMID： 18599743     DOI： 10.1126/science.1162115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Science        ISSN： 0036-8075            Impact factor:   47.728


× No keyword cloud information.
  12 in total

1.  A Discussion on Governmental Research Grants.

Authors:  Hui Fang
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2014-08-22       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  A more comprehensive index in the evaluation of scientific research: the single researcher impact factor proposal.

Authors:  Gianluca Castelnuovo; Daniel Limonta; Luis Sarmiento; Enrico Molinari
Journal:  Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health       Date:  2010-11-05

3.  Nine criteria for a measure of scientific output.

Authors:  Gabriel Kreiman; John H R Maunsell
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 2.380

Review 4.  Industrial methodology for process verification in research (IMPROVER): toward systems biology verification.

Authors:  Pablo Meyer; Julia Hoeng; J Jeremy Rice; Raquel Norel; Jörg Sprengel; Katrin Stolle; Thomas Bonk; Stephanie Corthesy; Ajay Royyuru; Manuel C Peitsch; Gustavo Stolovitzky
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  Teleconference versus face-to-face scientific peer review of grant application: effects on review outcomes.

Authors:  Stephen A Gallo; Afton S Carpenter; Scott R Glisson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Complex systems approach to scientific publication and peer-review system: development of an agent-based model calibrated with empirical journal data.

Authors:  Michail Kovanis; Raphaël Porcher; Philippe Ravaud; Ludovic Trinquart
Journal:  Scientometrics       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 3.238

7.  Editorial behaviors in peer review.

Authors:  Wei Wang; Xiangjie Kong; Jun Zhang; Zhen Chen; Feng Xia; Xianwen Wang
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-06-27

8.  The Global Burden of Journal Peer Review in the Biomedical Literature: Strong Imbalance in the Collective Enterprise.

Authors:  Michail Kovanis; Raphaël Porcher; Philippe Ravaud; Ludovic Trinquart
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Duration and quality of the peer review process: the author's perspective.

Authors:  Janine Huisman; Jeroen Smits
Journal:  Scientometrics       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 3.238

10.  Assessing Individual Intellectual Output in Scientific Research: Mexico's National System for Evaluating Scholars Performance in the Humanities and the Behavioral Sciences.

Authors:  Eugenio Frixione; Lourdes Ruiz-Zamarripa; Gerardo Hernández
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 3.240
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.