Literature DB >> 18599415

Ultrasonic guided waves in bone.

Petro Moilanen1.   

Abstract

Recent progress in quantitative ultrasound (QUS) has shown increasing interest toward measuring long bones by ultrasonic guided waves. This technology is widely used in the field of nondestructive testing and evaluation of different waveguide structures. Cortical bone provides such an elastic waveguide and its ability to sustain loading and resist fractures is known to be related to its mechanical properties at different length scales. Because guided waves could yield diverse characterizations of the bone's mechanical properties at the macroscopic level, the method of guided waves has a strong potential over the standardized bone densitometry as a tool for bone assessment. Despite this, development of guided wave methods is challenging, e.g., due to interferences and multiparametric inversion problems. This paper discusses the promises and challenges related to bone characterization by ultrasonic guided waves.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18599415     DOI: 10.1109/TUFFC.2008.790

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control        ISSN: 0885-3010            Impact factor:   2.725


  19 in total

1.  Multi-frequency axial transmission bone ultrasonometer.

Authors:  Alexey Tatarinov; Vladimir Egorov; Noune Sarvazyan; Armen Sarvazyan
Journal:  Ultrasonics       Date:  2013-10-12       Impact factor: 2.890

2.  A free plate model can predict guided modes propagating in tubular bone-mimicking phantoms.

Authors:  Jean-Gabriel Minonzio; Josquin Foiret; Petro Moilanen; Jalmari Pirhonen; Zuomin Zhao; Maryline Talmant; Jussi Timonen; Pascal Laugier
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Ultrasound to assess bone quality.

Authors:  Kay Raum; Quentin Grimal; Peter Varga; Reinhard Barkmann; Claus C Glüer; Pascal Laugier
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 5.096

4.  Artificial neural network to estimate micro-architectural properties of cortical bone using ultrasonic attenuation: A 2-D numerical study.

Authors:  Kaustav Mohanty; Omid Yousefian; Yasamin Karbalaeisadegh; Micah Ulrich; Quentin Grimal; Marie Muller
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 4.589

5.  Ultrasound Characterization of Bone Demineralization Using a Support Vector Machine.

Authors:  Max Denis; Leighton Wan; Mostafa Fatemi; Azra Alizad
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2017-12-25       Impact factor: 2.998

6.  Axial transmission method for long bone fracture evaluation by ultrasonic guided waves: simulation, phantom and in vitro experiments.

Authors:  Kailiang Xu; Dean Ta; Runxin He; Yi-Xian Qin; Weiqi Wang
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2014-01-13       Impact factor: 2.998

7.  Clinical assessment of the 1/3 radius using a new desktop ultrasonic bone densitometer.

Authors:  Emily M Stein; Fernando Rosete; Polly Young; Mafo Kamanda-Kosseh; Donald J McMahon; Gangming Luo; Jonathan J Kaufman; Elizabeth Shane; Robert S Siffert
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2013-01-11       Impact factor: 2.998

8.  Femur ultrasound (FemUS)--first clinical results on hip fracture discrimination and estimation of femoral BMD.

Authors:  R Barkmann; S Dencks; P Laugier; F Padilla; K Brixen; J Ryg; A Seekamp; L Mahlke; A Bremer; M Heller; C C Glüer
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-08-20       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Application of the dual-frequency ultrasonometer for osteoporosis detection.

Authors:  Armen Sarvazyan; Alexey Tatarinov; Vladimir Egorov; Souren Airapetian; Victor Kurtenok; Charles J Gatt
Journal:  Ultrasonics       Date:  2008-11-01       Impact factor: 2.890

10.  Topology Optimization-Based Damage Identification Using Visualized Ultrasonic Wave Propagation.

Authors:  Kazuki Ryuzono; Shigeki Yashiro; Hiroto Nagai; Nobuyuki Toyama
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 3.623

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.