Literature DB >> 18599407

Instrumentation for in vivo ultrasonic characterization of bone strength.

Pascal Laugier1.   

Abstract

Although it has been more than 20 years since the first recorded use of a quantitative ultrasound (QUS) technology to predict bone fragility, the field has not yet reached its maturity. QUS has the potential to predict fracture risk in several clinical circumstances and has the advantages of being nonionizing, inexpensive, portable, highly acceptable to patients, and repeatable. However, the wide dissemination of QUS in clinical practice is still limited and suffering from the absence of clinical consensus on how to integrate QUS technologies in bone densitometry armamentarium. Several critical issues need to be addressed to develop the role of QUS within rheumatology. These include issues of technologies adapted to measure the central skeleton, data acquisition, and signal processing procedures to reveal bone properties beyond bone mineral quantity and elucidation of the complex interaction between ultrasound and bone structure. This article reviews the state-of-the art in technological developments applied to assess bone strength in vivo. We describe generic measurement and signal processing methods implemented in clinical ultrasound devices, the devices and their practical use, and performance measures. The article also points out the present limitations, especially those related to the absence of standardization, and the lack of comprehensive theoretical models. We conclude with suggestions of future lines and trends in technology challenges and research areas such as new acquisition modes, advanced signal processing techniques, and modelization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18599407     DOI: 10.1109/TUFFC.2008.782

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control        ISSN: 0885-3010            Impact factor:   2.725


  25 in total

1.  Relationships of quantitative ultrasound parameters with cancellous bone microstructure in human calcaneus in vitro.

Authors:  Keith A Wear; Srinidhi Nagaraja; Maureen L Dreher; Sheng L Gibson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Determining attenuation properties of interfering fast and slow ultrasonic waves in cancellous bone.

Authors:  Amber M Nelson; Joseph J Hoffman; Christian C Anderson; Mark R Holland; Yoshiki Nagatani; Katsunori Mizuno; Mami Matsukawa; James G Miller
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Ultrasound simulation in the distal radius using clinical high-resolution peripheral-CT images.

Authors:  Vincent Le Floch; Donald J McMahon; Gangming Luo; Adi Cohen; Jonathan J Kaufman; Elizabeth Shane; Robert S Siffert
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2008-03-14       Impact factor: 2.998

Review 4.  Quantitative ultrasound in the assessment of skeletal status.

Authors:  Giuseppe Guglielmi; Judith Adams; Thomas M Link
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Multi-frequency axial transmission bone ultrasonometer.

Authors:  Alexey Tatarinov; Vladimir Egorov; Noune Sarvazyan; Armen Sarvazyan
Journal:  Ultrasonics       Date:  2013-10-12       Impact factor: 2.890

6.  Estimation of fast and slow wave properties in cancellous bone using Prony's method and curve fitting.

Authors:  Keith A Wear
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Relationships among ultrasonic and mechanical properties of cancellous bone in human calcaneus in vitro.

Authors:  Keith A Wear; Srinidhi Nagaraja; Maureen L Dreher; Saghi Sadoughi; Shan Zhu; Tony M Keaveny
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 4.398

8.  Ultrasound to assess bone quality.

Authors:  Kay Raum; Quentin Grimal; Peter Varga; Reinhard Barkmann; Claus C Glüer; Pascal Laugier
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 5.096

9.  Time-domain separation of interfering waves in cancellous bone using bandlimited deconvolution: simulation and phantom study.

Authors:  Keith A Wear
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Clinical assessment of the 1/3 radius using a new desktop ultrasonic bone densitometer.

Authors:  Emily M Stein; Fernando Rosete; Polly Young; Mafo Kamanda-Kosseh; Donald J McMahon; Gangming Luo; Jonathan J Kaufman; Elizabeth Shane; Robert S Siffert
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2013-01-11       Impact factor: 2.998

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.