Literature DB >> 18599163

Continuing professional development and the charity paradigm: interrelated individual, collective and organisational issues about continuing professional development.

Kathleen M Munro1.   

Abstract

This paper aims to highlight some issues and tensions that currently challenge the profession, individual nurses and their employers when considering the need for continuing professional development. The Nursing and Midwifery Council states the professional requirements for continuing professional development. However the nature and type required seems to be determined by the individual on the one hand and the organisation on the other, rather than an integral part of professional activity within the context of work. This can lead to a mismatch between personal and organisational goals. Views emerged from participants in a previous case study that focused on learning through work, about support available to nurses for professional development. The perceptions of nurses and their managers about learning through work were explored, using semi structured interviews, picture mapping and structured interviews. The 'Charity Paradigm' is presented as an outcome of major issues within an organisation. It underpins negative perceptions of individuals about employer support of continuing professional development. It is suggested that there is a need for collaborative collective approaches to structured development in order to meet both individual and organisational needs. This is also advocated in order to achieve life long learning and transformational learning within an organisation. The tension between individual personal ambitions and employer demands can adversely affect the professional development of the practitioner and the organisation that employs them. The personal perspectives of nurses and managers about learning within their organisation are therefore important to acknowledge in terms of positive and negative influences. It is also necessary to recognise the contribution of the employer as well as the identifiable charitable contribution of individual practitioners and the input from external contributors to the organisation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18599163     DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2008.05.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nurse Educ Today        ISSN: 0260-6917            Impact factor:   3.442


  6 in total

1.  Exploring nurses' experiences of social media and in-person educational interventions for professional development: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Seyedeh-Somayeh Kazemi; Sedigheh-Sadat Tavafian; Alireza Hidarnia; Ali Montazeri
Journal:  BMC Nurs       Date:  2022-05-24

2.  Continuing education among Chinese nurses: a general hospital-based study.

Authors:  Chunping Ni; Yan Hua; Pei Shao; Gwenyth R Wallen; Shasha Xu; Lu Li
Journal:  Nurse Educ Today       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 3.442

Review 3.  Structure and Outcomes of Educational Programs for Training Non-electroencephalographers in Performing and Screening Adult EEG: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Julie Kromm; Kirsten M Fiest; Ayham Alkhachroum; Colin Josephson; Andreas Kramer; Nathalie Jette
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 3.210

4.  How to become an expert educator: a qualitative study on the view of health professionals with experience in patient education.

Authors:  Margrét Hrönn Svavarsdóttir; Árún K Sigurðardóttir; Aslak Steinsbekk
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 2.463

5.  Nurses' perceptions of continuing professional development: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Xiaoyan Yu; Yi Huang; Yu Liu
Journal:  BMC Nurs       Date:  2022-06-23

6.  Determinants of and opportunities for continuing education among health care professionals in public health care institutions in Jimma township, Southwest Ethiopia.

Authors:  Netsanet Fentahun; Ashagre Molla
Journal:  Adv Med Educ Pract       Date:  2012-09-18
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.