BACKGROUND: Steatosis decreases survival of liver grafts after transplantation due to poorly understood mechanisms. We examined the effect of steatosis on the survival of liver grafts in a rat liver transplantation model and the viability of cultured rat hepatocytes after hypoxia and reoxygenation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Rats were fed a choline and methionine-deficient diet to induce hepatic steatosis, and the livers were transplanted into recipient rats after 6 h of cold storage. Cultured hepatocytes were made steatotic by incubation for 3 d in fatty acid-supplemented medium. Hypoxia and reoxygenation were induced by placing the cultures in a 90% N(2)/10% CO(2) atmosphere for 4 h, followed by return to normoxic conditions for 6 h. Hepatocyte viability was assessed by lactate dehydrogenase release and mitochondrial potential staining. RESULTS: Transplanted steatotic livers exhibited 0% viability compared with 90% for lean liver controls. When donor choline and methionine-deficient diet rats were returned to a normal diet, hepatic fat content decreased while viability of the grafts after transplantation increased. Cultured steatotic hepatocytes generated more mitochondrial superoxide, exhibited a lowered mitochondrial membrane potential, and released significantly more lactate dehydrogenase after hypoxia and reoxygenation than lean hepatocyte controls. When steatotic hepatocytes were defatted by incubating in fatty acid-free medium, they became less sensitive to hypoxia and reoxygenation as the remaining intracellular triglyceride content decreased. CONCLUSIONS: Hepatic steatosis reversibly decreases viability of hepatocytes after hypoxia and reoxygenation in vitro. The decreased viability of steatotic livers after transplantation may be due to a direct effect of hypoxia and reoxygenation on hepatocytes, and can be reversed by defatting.
BACKGROUND:Steatosis decreases survival of liver grafts after transplantation due to poorly understood mechanisms. We examined the effect of steatosis on the survival of liver grafts in a rat liver transplantation model and the viability of cultured rat hepatocytes after hypoxia and reoxygenation. MATERIALS AND METHODS:Rats were fed a choline and methionine-deficient diet to induce hepatic steatosis, and the livers were transplanted into recipient rats after 6 h of cold storage. Cultured hepatocytes were made steatotic by incubation for 3 d in fatty acid-supplemented medium. Hypoxia and reoxygenation were induced by placing the cultures in a 90% N(2)/10% CO(2) atmosphere for 4 h, followed by return to normoxic conditions for 6 h. Hepatocyte viability was assessed by lactate dehydrogenase release and mitochondrial potential staining. RESULTS: Transplanted steatotic livers exhibited 0% viability compared with 90% for lean liver controls. When donorcholine and methionine-deficient diet rats were returned to a normal diet, hepatic fat content decreased while viability of the grafts after transplantation increased. Cultured steatotic hepatocytes generated more mitochondrial superoxide, exhibited a lowered mitochondrial membrane potential, and released significantly more lactate dehydrogenase after hypoxia and reoxygenation than lean hepatocyte controls. When steatotic hepatocytes were defatted by incubating in fatty acid-free medium, they became less sensitive to hypoxia and reoxygenation as the remaining intracellular triglyceride content decreased. CONCLUSIONS:Hepatic steatosis reversibly decreases viability of hepatocytes after hypoxia and reoxygenation in vitro. The decreased viability of steatotic livers after transplantation may be due to a direct effect of hypoxia and reoxygenation on hepatocytes, and can be reversed by defatting.
Authors: A K Chui; L W Shi; A R Rao; D J Verran; D Painter; D Koorey; G W McCaughan; A G Sheil Journal: Transplant Proc Date: 2000-11 Impact factor: 1.066
Authors: Herman Tolboom; Roos Pouw; Korkut Uygun; Yoko Tanimura; Maria-Louisa Izamis; François Berthiaume; Martin L Yarmush Journal: Tissue Eng Date: 2007-08
Authors: Yasuji Mokuno; François Berthiaume; Ronald G Tompkins; Ulysses J Balis; Martin L Yarmush Journal: Liver Transpl Date: 2004-02 Impact factor: 5.799
Authors: Ryan N Fiorini; Stephen F Shafizadeh; Carmen Polito; David W Rodwell; Gang Cheng; Zachary Evans; Chidan Wan; Sarah Belden; Julia K Haines; Jennifer Birsner; David Lewin; Karen R Wasiluk; David L Dunn; Michael G Schmidt; Kenneth D Chavin Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 8.086
Authors: Kenneth D Chavin; Ryan N Fiorini; Stephen Shafizadeh; Gang Cheng; Chidan Wan; Zachary Evans; David Rodwell; Carmen Polito; Julia K Haines; G Mark Baillie; Michael G Schmidt Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 8.086
Authors: Nir I Nativ; Alvin I Chen; Gabriel Yarmush; Scot D Henry; Jay H Lefkowitch; Kenneth M Klein; Timothy J Maguire; Rene Schloss; James V Guarrera; Francois Berthiaume; Martin L Yarmush Journal: Liver Transpl Date: 2013-12-12 Impact factor: 5.799
Authors: N I Nativ; T J Maguire; G Yarmush; D L Brasaemle; S D Henry; J V Guarrera; F Berthiaume; M L Yarmush Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2012-10-11 Impact factor: 8.086
Authors: Zhen-Yu Xiao; Babak Banan; Jianluo Jia; Pamela T Manning; Ronald R Hiebsch; Muthukumar Gunasekaran; Gundumi A Upadhya; William A Frazier; Thalachallour Mohanakumar; Yiing Lin; William C Chapman Journal: Liver Transpl Date: 2015-01-29 Impact factor: 5.799
Authors: Ricardo C Gehrau; Valeria R Mas; Catherine I Dumur; Jihee L Suh; Ashish K Sharma; Helen P Cathro; Daniel G Maluf Journal: Transplantation Date: 2015-12 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Nir I Nativ; Gabriel Yarmush; Alvin Chen; David Dong; Scot D Henry; James V Guarrera; Kenneth M Klein; Tim Maguire; Rene Schloss; Francois Berthiaume; Martin L Yarmush Journal: J Hepatol Date: 2013-07-19 Impact factor: 25.083