Literature DB >> 18598725

Enhanced facial EMG activity in response to dynamic facial expressions.

Wataru Sato1, Tomomi Fujimura, Naoto Suzuki.   

Abstract

The suggestion that dynamic facial expressions of emotion induce more evident facial mimicry than static ones remains controversial. We investigated this issue by recording EMG from the corrugator supercilii and zygomatic major. Dynamic and static facial expressions of anger and happiness were presented. Dynamic presentations of angry expressions induced stronger EMG activity from the corrugator supercilii than static presentations, while dynamic presentations of happy expressions induced stronger EMG activity from the zygomatic major compared to static presentations. These results indicate that dynamic facial expressions induce facial EMG activity interpretable as facial mimicry more evidently than static expressions.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18598725     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2008.06.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol        ISSN: 0167-8760            Impact factor:   2.997


  40 in total

1.  Do Dynamic Compared to Static Facial Expressions of Happiness and Anger Reveal Enhanced Facial Mimicry?

Authors:  Krystyna Rymarczyk; Łukasz Żurawski; Kamila Jankowiak-Siuda; Iwona Szatkowska
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Impaired overt facial mimicry in response to dynamic facial expressions in high-functioning autism spectrum disorders.

Authors:  Sayaka Yoshimura; Wataru Sato; Shota Uono; Motomi Toichi
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2015-05

3.  Widespread and lateralized social brain activity for processing dynamic facial expressions.

Authors:  Wataru Sato; Takanori Kochiyama; Shota Uono; Reiko Sawada; Yasutaka Kubota; Sayaka Yoshimura; Motomi Toichi
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  How the visual brain detects emotional changes in facial expressions: Evidence from driven and intrinsic brain oscillations.

Authors:  Rafaela R Campagnoli; Matthias J Wieser; L Forest Gruss; Maeve R Boylan; Lisa M McTeague; Andreas Keil
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 4.027

5.  Automatic facial mimicry in response to dynamic emotional stimuli in five-month-old infants.

Authors:  Tomoko Isomura; Tamami Nakano
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Subnormal short-latency facial mimicry responses to dynamic emotional facial expressions in male adolescents with disruptive behavior disorders and callous-unemotional traits.

Authors:  Anton van Boxtel; Ruud Zaalberg; Minet de Wied
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2021-09-22       Impact factor: 4.348

7.  Stop looking angry and smile, please: start and stop of the very same facial expression differentially activate threat- and reward-related brain networks.

Authors:  Andreas Mühlberger; Matthias J Wieser; Antje B M Gerdes; Monika C M Frey; Peter Weyers; Paul Pauli
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 3.436

8.  Non-suicidal self-injury and emotion regulation: a review on facial emotion recognition and facial mimicry.

Authors:  Tina In-Albon; Martina Bürli; Claudia Ruf; Marc Schmid
Journal:  Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 3.033

9.  Self-relevance appraisal influences facial reactions to emotional body expressions.

Authors:  Julie Grèzes; Léonor Philip; Michèle Chadwick; Guillaume Dezecache; Robert Soussignan; Laurence Conty
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Relationships among facial mimicry, emotional experience, and emotion recognition.

Authors:  Wataru Sato; Tomomi Fujimura; Takanori Kochiyama; Naoto Suzuki
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-25       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.