Literature DB >> 18598011

Flexibility of human cytochromes P450: molecular dynamics reveals differences between CYPs 3A4, 2C9, and 2A6, which correlate with their substrate preferences.

Josef Skopalík1, Pavel Anzenbacher, Michal Otyepka.   

Abstract

Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations at normal and high temperature were used to study the flexibility and malleability of three microsomal cytochromes P450 (CYPs): CYP3A4, CYP2C9, and CYP2A6. Comparison of B-factors (describing the atomic fluctuations) between X-ray and MD data shows that the X-ray B-factors are significantly lower in the regions where the crystal contacts occur than for other regions. Consequently, the conclusions about CYP flexibility based solely on the X-ray data might be misleading. Comparison of flexibility patterns of the three CYPs enabled common features and variations in flexibility and malleability of the studied CYPs to be identified. The previously described pattern of flexibility in topological elements of microsomal CYPs (a rigid heme binding core, a malleable distal side and intermediately flexible proximal side) was confirmed. These topological features provide an important combination of high stereo- and regio-specificity (mediated by the relative rigidity in the neighborhood of the heme), together with high substrate promiscuity due to the more flexible active site and the malleability of the distal side. The data acquired here show that the malleability of the three studied CYPs correlates with their substrate specificity: CYP2A6 has a narrow substrate range and is the most rigid, CYP3A4 is the most promiscuous CYP known and is the most malleable, and CYP2C9 is intermediate in terms of both its substrate specificity and malleability. Thus, the malleability of CYPs is probably a major determinant of their substrate specificity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18598011     DOI: 10.1021/jp800311c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phys Chem B        ISSN: 1520-5207            Impact factor:   2.991


  42 in total

1.  Exploration of the binding of curcumin analogues to human P450 2C9 based on docking and molecular dynamics simulation.

Authors:  Rongwei Shi; Yin Wang; Xiaolei Zhu; Xiaohua Lu
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2011-11-12       Impact factor: 1.810

Review 2.  Substrate tunnels in enzymes: structure-function relationships and computational methodology.

Authors:  Laura J Kingsley; Markus A Lill
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2015-02-28

3.  Effect of conformational dynamics on substrate recognition and specificity as probed by the introduction of a de novo disulfide bond into cytochrome P450 2B1.

Authors:  Haoming Zhang; Cesar Kenaan; Djemel Hamdane; Gaston Hui Bon Hoa; Paul F Hollenberg
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 4.  Predicting drug metabolism: experiment and/or computation?

Authors:  Johannes Kirchmair; Andreas H Göller; Dieter Lang; Jens Kunze; Bernard Testa; Ian D Wilson; Robert C Glen; Gisbert Schneider
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 84.694

5.  Structural differences between soluble and membrane bound cytochrome P450s.

Authors:  I G Denisov; A Y Shih; S G Sligar
Journal:  J Inorg Biochem       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 4.155

6.  The role of cytochrome P450 2B6 and 2B4 substrate access channel residues predicted based on crystal structures of the amlodipine complexes.

Authors:  Hyun-Hee Jang; Dmitri R Davydov; Ga-Young Lee; Chul-Ho Yun; James R Halpert
Journal:  Arch Biochem Biophys       Date:  2014-01-18       Impact factor: 4.013

7.  Protein dynamics in cytochrome P450 molecular recognition and substrate specificity using 2D IR vibrational echo spectroscopy.

Authors:  Megan C Thielges; Jean K Chung; Michael D Fayer
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2011-02-24       Impact factor: 15.419

8.  Conformational adaptation of human cytochrome P450 2B6 and rabbit cytochrome P450 2B4 revealed upon binding multiple amlodipine molecules.

Authors:  Manish B Shah; P Ross Wilderman; Jaime Pascual; Qinghai Zhang; C David Stout; James R Halpert
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2012-09-04       Impact factor: 3.162

9.  Class-specific restrictions define primase interactions with DNA template and replicative helicase.

Authors:  Marilynn A Larson; Mark A Griep; Rafael Bressani; Kiran Chintakayala; Panos Soultanas; Steven H Hinrichs
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Catalytic Promiscuity of Ancestral Esterases and Hydroxynitrile Lyases.

Authors:  Titu Devamani; Alissa M Rauwerdink; Mark Lunzer; Bryan J Jones; Joanna L Mooney; Maxilmilien Alaric O Tan; Zhi-Jun Zhang; Jian-He Xu; Antony M Dean; Romas J Kazlauskas
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 15.419

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.