Literature DB >> 18597623

Genetic analysis of female preference functions as function-valued traits.

Katrina McGuigan1, Anna Van Homrigh, Mark W Blows.   

Abstract

The genetic analysis of female preferences has been seen as a particularly challenging empirical endeavor because of difficulties in generating suitable preference metrics in experiments large enough to adequately characterize variation. In this article, we take an alternative approach, treating female preference as a function-valued trait and exploiting random-coefficient models to characterize the genetic basis of female preference without measuring preference functions in each individual. Applying this approach to Drosophila bunnanda, in which females assess males through a multivariate contact pheromone system, we gain three valuable insights into the genetic basis of female preference functions. First, most genetic variation was attributable to one eigenfunction, suggesting shared genetic control of preferences for nine male pheromones. Second, genetic variance in female preference functions was not associated with genetic variance in the pheromones, implying that genetic variation in female preference did not maintain genetic variation in male traits. Finally, breeding values for female preference functions were skewed away from the direction of selection on the male traits, suggesting directional selection on female preferences. The genetic analysis of female preference functions as function-valued traits offers a robust statistical framework for investigations of female preference, in addition to alleviating some experimental difficulties associated with estimating variation in preference functions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18597623     DOI: 10.1086/588075

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Nat        ISSN: 0003-0147            Impact factor:   3.926


  7 in total

1.  Does segregating variation in sexual or microhabitat preferences lead to non-random mating within a population of Drosophila melanogaster?

Authors:  Brad R Foley; Anne Genissel; Harmon L Kristy; Sergey V Nuzhdin
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2009-08-19       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Bias in the heritability of preference and its potential impact on the evolution of mate choice.

Authors:  D A Roff; D J Fairbairn
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2015-01-21       Impact factor: 3.821

3.  Reduced compensatory growth capacity in mistimed broods of a migratory passerine.

Authors:  Gergely Hegyi; Gergely Nagy; János Török
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Dimensionality of mate choice, sexual isolation, and speciation.

Authors:  Paul A Hohenlohe; Stevan J Arnold
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-09-07       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Decomposing phenotypic skew and its effects on the predicted response to strong selection.

Authors:  Joel L Pick; Hannah E Lemon; Caroline E Thomson; Jarrod D Hadfield
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 19.100

6.  Breeding experience and the heritability of female mate choice in collared flycatchers.

Authors:  Gergely Hegyi; Márton Herényi; Alastair J Wilson; László Zsolt Garamszegi; Balázs Rosivall; Marcel Eens; János Török
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Conspicuous female ornamentation and tests of male mate preference in threespine sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus).

Authors:  Daniel Shane Wright; Michele E R Pierotti; Howard D Rundle; Jeffrey S McKinnon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.