Literature DB >> 18596719

Central blood pressure measurement may improve risk stratification.

Je Sharman1, M Stowasser, Rg Fassett, Th Marwick, Ss Franklin.   

Abstract

Central systolic blood pressure (SBP) may differ between individuals with similar brachial SBP, which may have implications for risk assessment. This study aimed to determine the variation and potential clinical value of central SBP between patients with similar brachial SBP. Brachial SBP was measured by sphygmomanometer and central SBP by radial tonometry in 675 people (430 men), comprising healthy individuals (n = 222), patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease (n = 229) and diabetes (n = 224). Individuals were stratified by brachial SBP in accordance with European Society of Hypertension guidelines (optimal, normal, high-normal, grades 1, 2 and 3 hypertension). The potential clinical value of central SBP was determined from the percentage of patients re-classified into different brachial SBP groups due to the difference between brachial and aortic SBP (defined as brachial SBP-central SBP). Central SBP increased with each brachial SBP level (optimal to grade 3 hypertension; P < 0.001 for all). However, large variation in brachial-aortic SBP difference occurred within each brachial SBP group (range 2-33 mm Hg), resulting in sizeable overlap of central SBP between brachial SBP groups. For patients with normal brachial SBP, 96% had central SBP within the range of patients with high-normal brachial SBP, as well as 64% within the range of patients with grade 1 hypertension. We conclude that wide variation in brachial-aortic SBP difference occurs between patients with similar brachial SBP. This results in a significant overlap of central SBP scores between brachial SBP risk groups. This is likely to have treatment implications but remains to be tested.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18596719     DOI: 10.1038/jhh.2008.71

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hum Hypertens        ISSN: 0950-9240            Impact factor:   3.012


  24 in total

Review 1.  Noninvasive measurement of central vascular pressures with arterial tonometry: clinical revival of the pulse pressure waveform?

Authors:  Matthew R Nelson; Jan Stepanek; Michael Cevette; Michael Covalciuc; R Todd Hurst; A Jamil Tajik
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 7.616

2.  Waiting a few extra minutes before measuring blood pressure has potentially important clinical and research ramifications.

Authors:  S B Nikolic; W P Abhayaratna; R Leano; M Stowasser; J E Sharman
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 3.012

3.  Practical Suitability of a Stand-Alone Oscillometric Central Blood Pressure Monitor: A Review of the Microlife WatchBP Office Central.

Authors:  Willem J Verberk; Hao-Min Cheng; Li-Chih Huang; Chia-Ming Lin; Yao-Pin Teng; Chen-Huan Chen
Journal:  Pulse (Basel)       Date:  2016-02-12

Review 4.  Arterial (Aortic) Stiffness in Patients with Resistant Hypertension: from Assessment to Treatment.

Authors:  James E Sharman; Pierre Boutouyrie; Stéphane Laurent
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 5.369

5.  Continuous blood pressure monitoring via non-invasive radial artery applanation tonometry and invasive arterial catheter demonstrates good agreement in patients undergoing colon carcinoma surgery.

Authors:  Jing Sun; Hanjian Chen; Jun Zheng; Bin Mao; Shengmei Zhu; Jingyi Feng
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 2.502

6.  Central-to-brachial blood pressure amplification in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rachel E Climie; Martin G Schultz; James W Fell; Lorena Romero; Petr Otahal; James E Sharman
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 3.012

7.  Derivation and validation of diagnostic thresholds for central blood pressure measurements based on long-term cardiovascular risks.

Authors:  Hao-Min Cheng; Shao-Yuan Chuang; Shih-Hsien Sung; Wen-Chung Yu; Alan Pearson; Edward G Lakatta; Wen-Harn Pan; Chen-Huan Chen
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 8.  Effectiveness of Vitamin D Supplementation for Cardiovascular Health Outcomes.

Authors:  Panagiota Veloudi; Graeme Jones; James E Sharman
Journal:  Pulse (Basel)       Date:  2016-12-09

9.  In vivo quantification of aortic stiffness using MR elastography in hypertensive porcine model.

Authors:  Huiming Dong; Ria Mazumder; Venkata Sita Priyanka Illapani; Xiaokui Mo; Richard D White; Arunark Kolipaka
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2017-02-05       Impact factor: 4.668

10.  Increased wave reflection and ejection duration in women with chest pain and nonobstructive coronary artery disease: ancillary study from the Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation.

Authors:  Wilmer W Nichols; Scott J Denardo; B Delia Johnson; Barry L Sharaf; C Noel Bairey Merz; Carl J Pepine
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 4.844

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.