Literature DB >> 18596453

Vagus nerve stimulation therapy after failed cranial surgery for intractable epilepsy: results from the vagus nerve stimulation therapy patient outcome registry.

Arun Paul Amar1, Michael L J Apuzzo, Charles Y Liu.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) therapy among patients with persistent or recurrent seizures after lobar resection, callosotomy, and other cranial operations for intractable epilepsy.
METHODS: Data were obtained from the VNS therapy patient outcome registry, which was established after United States Food and Drug Administration approval of the VNS device in 1997 as a means of capturing open-label clinical data outside of protocol. The integrity of the systems for collecting and processing registry data was authenticated by an independent auditing agency. The effect of potential selection bias, however, remains uncertain.
RESULTS: Two nonconsecutive cohorts were compared: patients tracked in the registry who had previously undergone cranial surgery for epilepsy (CS group, n=921) and those who had not (non-CS group, n = 3822). For the CS group, the median reduction in seizure frequency was 42.5% after 3 months of VNS therapy, 42.9% at 6 months, 45.7% at 12 months, 52.0% at 18 months, and 50.5% at 24 months. For the non-CS group, analogous rates were 47.0%, 52.9%, 60.0%, 62.7%, and 66.7%, respectively. In the CS group, seizures were reduced by at least 50% in 55.1% of patients, at least 75% in 31.4% of patients, at least 90% in 17.3% of patients, and 100% in 5.1% of patients after 24 months of VNS therapy. Response rates were more pronounced in the non-CS group: at least 50% in 62.2% of patients, at least 75% in 43.7% of patients, at least 90% in 26.8% of patients, and 100% in 8.3% of patients. Patients in both groups experienced marked improvements in quality of life parameters.
CONCLUSION: The effectiveness of VNS is maintained during prolonged stimulation, and overall seizure control continues to improve with time. Patients in whom prior cranial surgery had failed did not respond as favorably as all other patients receiving VNS therapy. Nonetheless, many of the former group improved substantially. Thus, on the basis of these open-label data, VNS therapy represents a potentially palliative treatment option for patients with refractory seizures after failed cranial surgery.

Entities:  

Year:  2008        PMID: 18596453     DOI: 10.1227/01.neu.0000316253.54651.5e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  6 in total

Review 1.  Seizure outcomes in nonresective epilepsy surgery: an update.

Authors:  Dario J Englot; Harjus Birk; Edward F Chang
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2016-05-21       Impact factor: 3.042

2.  Efficacy of vagus nerve stimulation in brain tumor-associated intractable epilepsy and the importance of tumor stability.

Authors:  Kunal S Patel; Nelson Moussazadeh; Werner K Doyle; Douglas R Labar; Theodore H Schwartz
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2013-04-19       Impact factor: 5.115

Review 3.  Vagus nerve stimulation in the treatment of refractory epilepsy.

Authors:  Andrew H Milby; Casey H Halpern; Gordon H Baltuch
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 7.620

Review 4.  Clinical utility of implantable neurostimulation devices as adjunctive treatment of uncontrolled seizures.

Authors:  Joanna H Cox; Stefano Seri; Andrea E Cavanna
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 2.570

5.  Neuromodulation Therapy with Vagus Nerve Stimulation for Intractable Epilepsy: A 2-Year Efficacy Analysis Study in Patients under 12 Years of Age.

Authors:  Suresh Gurbani; Sirichai Chayasirisobhon; Leslie Cahan; SooHo Choi; Bruce Enos; Jane Hwang; Meei Lin; Jeffrey Schweitzer
Journal:  Epilepsy Res Treat       Date:  2016-02-10

Review 6.  Health Technology Assessment Report on Vagus Nerve Stimulation in Drug-Resistant Epilepsy.

Authors:  Carlo Efisio Marras; Gabriella Colicchio; Luca De Palma; Alessandro De Benedictis; Giancarlo Di Gennaro; Marilou Cavaliere; Elisabetta Cesaroni; Alessandro Consales; Sofia Asioli; Massimo Caulo; Flavio Villani; Nelia Zamponi
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 3.390

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.