Literature DB >> 18596176

Physicians' views on public reporting of hospital quality data.

Judith K Barr1, Shulamit L Bernard, Shoshanna Sofaer, Tierney E Giannotti, Nancy F Lenfestey, David J Miranda.   

Abstract

This article describes physicians' responses to patient questions and physicians' views about public reports on hospital quality. Interviews with 56 office-based physicians in seven states/regions used hypothetical scenarios of patients questioning referrals based on public reports of hospital quality. Responses were analyzed using an iterative coding process to develop categories and themes from data. Four themes describe physicians' responses to patients: (a) rely on existing physician-patient relationships, (b) acknowledge and consider patient perspectives, (c) take actions to follow up on patient concerns, and (d) provide patients' perspectives on quality reports. Three themes summarize responses to hospital quality reports: perceived lack of methodological rigor, content considerations in reports, and attitudes/experience regarding reports. Findings suggest that physicians take seriously patients' questions about hospital-quality reports and consider changing referral recommendations based on their concerns and/or preferences. Results underscore the importance of efforts by report developers and physician outreach/education to address physicians' methodological concerns.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18596176     DOI: 10.1177/1077558708319734

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care Res Rev        ISSN: 1077-5587            Impact factor:   3.929


  11 in total

1.  Facts and Fears in Public Reporting: Patients' Information Needs and Priorities When Selecting a Hospital for Cancer Care.

Authors:  Susan Chimonas; Elizabeth Fortier; Diane G Li; Allison Lipitz-Snyderman
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 2.583

2.  Physician Beliefs About Online Reporting of Quality and Experience Data.

Authors:  Tara Lagu; Jacqueline Haskell; Emily Cooper; Daniel A Harris; Anne Murray; Rebekah L Gardner
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  A qualitative analysis of hospital leaders' opinions about publicly reported measures of health care quality.

Authors:  Sarah L Goff; Tara Lagu; Penelope S Pekow; Nicholas S Hannon; Kristen L Hinchey; Talia A Jackowitz; Patrick J Tolosky; Peter K Lindenauer
Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf       Date:  2015-04

4.  Use of care management practices in small- and medium-sized physician groups: do public reporting of physician quality and financial incentives matter?

Authors:  Jeffrey A Alexander; Daniel Maeng; Lawrence P Casalino; Diane Rittenhouse
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-08-10       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  A pilot qualitative study to explore stakeholder opinions regarding prescribing quality indicators.

Authors:  Liana Martirosyan; Joekie Markhorst; Petra Denig; Flora M Haaijer-Ruskamp; Jozé Braspenning
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-07-07       Impact factor: 2.655

6.  Public release of hospital quality data for referral practices in Germany: results from a cluster-randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Martin Emmert; Nina Meszmer; Lisa Jablonski; Lena Zinth; Oliver Schöffski; Fatemeh Taheri-Zadeh
Journal:  Health Econ Rev       Date:  2017-09-26

7.  Mandatory quality reports in Germany from the hospitals' point of view: a cross-sectional observational study.

Authors:  Silke Auras; Werner de Cruppé; Karl Blum; Max Geraedts
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-10-31       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  Comparative performance information plays no role in the referral behaviour of GPs.

Authors:  Nicole A B M Ketelaar; Marjan J Faber; Glyn Elwyn; Gert P Westert; Jozé C Braspenning
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 2.497

9.  Does public reporting influence antibiotic and injection prescribing to all patients? A cluster-randomized matched-pair trial in china.

Authors:  Chenxi Liu; Xinping Zhang; Xuan Wang; Xiaopeng Zhang; Jie Wan; Fangying Zhong
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.889

10.  General practitioners' perceptions of public reporting of institution and individual medicine prescribing data.

Authors:  Xin Du; Xinping Zhang; Yuqing Tang
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.