BACKGROUND: Chronic haemodialysis patients are at an increased risk of peripheral artery disease (PAD). Although percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) has become a widely used therapeutic intervention for PAD, its outcome in haemodialysis patients remains poorly understood. The aim of this study was to clarify the long-term outcome of PTA as a primary treatment for PAD in haemodialysis patients. METHODS: Consecutive 118 haemodialysis patients with 205 lesions and 108 non-haemodialysis patients with 143 lesions who underwent successful PTA as a first-choice therapeutic option for PAD were enrolled. Outcome measures included primary patency, limb salvage and survival. RESULTS: Incidence of diabetes, history of coronary artery disease and femoropopliteal lesion were significantly more frequent in haemodialysis patients (P = 0.008, 0.005 and 0.0001, respectively), but critical limb ischaemia and TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC) lesion types occurred with comparable frequency in both groups. No patients had in-hospital complications. The 5-year primary patency, limb salvage and survival rates were significantly lower in haemodialysis patients (P = 0.01, 0.029 and 0.0024, respectively). On Cox multivariate analysis, haemodialysis was strongly predictive of amputation and all-cause death, but not of restenosis. In haemodialysis patients, TASC C+D lesion and ulceration/gangrene were independent predictors for restenosis and amputation. CONCLUSIONS: The long-term outcome after PTA may be fully acceptable in haemodialysis patients who are at the highest risk of cardiovascular disease. PTA is a useful therapeutic strategy in haemodialysis patients with PAD, but PTA for TASC C+D lesions remains controversial.
BACKGROUND:Chronic haemodialysispatients are at an increased risk of peripheral artery disease (PAD). Although percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) has become a widely used therapeutic intervention for PAD, its outcome in haemodialysis patients remains poorly understood. The aim of this study was to clarify the long-term outcome of PTA as a primary treatment for PAD in haemodialysis patients. METHODS: Consecutive 118 haemodialysis patients with 205 lesions and 108 non-haemodialysis patients with 143 lesions who underwent successful PTA as a first-choice therapeutic option for PAD were enrolled. Outcome measures included primary patency, limb salvage and survival. RESULTS: Incidence of diabetes, history of coronary artery disease and femoropopliteal lesion were significantly more frequent in haemodialysis patients (P = 0.008, 0.005 and 0.0001, respectively), but critical limb ischaemia and TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC) lesion types occurred with comparable frequency in both groups. No patients had in-hospital complications. The 5-year primary patency, limb salvage and survival rates were significantly lower in haemodialysis patients (P = 0.01, 0.029 and 0.0024, respectively). On Cox multivariate analysis, haemodialysis was strongly predictive of amputation and all-cause death, but not of restenosis. In haemodialysis patients, TASC C+D lesion and ulceration/gangrene were independent predictors for restenosis and amputation. CONCLUSIONS: The long-term outcome after PTA may be fully acceptable in haemodialysis patients who are at the highest risk of cardiovascular disease. PTA is a useful therapeutic strategy in haemodialysis patients with PAD, but PTA for TASC C+D lesions remains controversial.
Authors: Paul P Heideman; Mohammad Reza Rajebi; Michael A McKusick; Haraldur Bjarnason; Gustavo S Oderich; Jeremy L Friese; Mark D Fleming; Andrew H Stockland; William S Harmsen; Jay Mandrekar; Sanjay Misra Journal: J Vasc Interv Radiol Date: 2016-06-16 Impact factor: 3.464
Authors: H Ishii; Y Kumada; H Takahashi; T Toriyama; T Aoyama; M Tanaka; D Yoshikawa; M Hayashi; H Kasuga; Y Yasuda; S Maruyama; T Matsubara; S Matsuo; T Murohara Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2012-05 Impact factor: 10.122