Literature DB >> 18595419

Assessment of recruit motivation and strength study: preaccession physical fitness assessment predicts early attrition.

David W Niebuhr1, Christine T Scott, Timothy E Powers, Yuanzhang Li, Weiwei Han, Amy M Millikan, Margot R Krauss.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Assessment of Recruit Motivation and Strength (ARMS) study was designed to pilot-test the use of a physical fitness screening tool for Army applicants before basic training.
METHODS: The ARMS test consists of two components, namely, a 5-minute step test and push-ups. Attrition among 7,612 recruits who underwent preaccession ARMS testing and began service between May 2004 and December 2005 was studied.
RESULTS: ARMS test performance was found to be significantly related to risk of attrition within 180 days; the hazard ratios for failing relative to passing the ARMS test were 2.27 (95% confidence interval, 1.70-3.04) among female subjects and 1.36 (95% confidence interval, 1.13-1.64) among male subjects. The attributable risk of attrition associated with failing the ARMS test was approximately 40% among female subjects and approximately 30% among male subjects. DISCUSSION: The ARMS study is the first prospective study conducted in the U.S. Army to assess physical fitness before accession. Physical fitness and motivation to serve were shown to correlate with attrition during initial entry training.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18595419     DOI: 10.7205/milmed.173.6.555

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mil Med        ISSN: 0026-4075            Impact factor:   1.437


  5 in total

1.  Prediction of Injuries and Injury Types in Army Basic Training, Infantry, Armor, and Cavalry Trainees Using a Common Fitness Screen.

Authors:  JoEllen M Sefton; K R Lohse; J S McAdam
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 2.860

2.  The Interrelationship of Common Clinical Movement Screens: Establishing Population-Specific Norms in a Large Cohort of Military Applicants.

Authors:  Sarah J de la Motte; Timothy C Gribbin; Peter Lisman; Anthony I Beutler; Patricia Deuster
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  Defining a molecular portrait of physical fitness.

Authors:  Adam Clouse; Sapna Deo; Evadnie Rampersaud; Jeff Farmer; Pascal J Goldschmidt-Clermont; Sylvia Daunert
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.142

4.  Spine buddy® supportive pad impact on single-leg static balance and a jogging gait of individuals wearing a military backpack.

Authors:  John Ward; Jesse Coats; Amir Pourmoghaddam
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2014-12-30       Impact factor: 2.193

5.  The grit effect: predicting retention in the military, the workplace, school and marriage.

Authors:  Lauren Eskreis-Winkler; Elizabeth P Shulman; Scott A Beal; Angela L Duckworth
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-02-03
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.