Ayesha S Bryant1, Robert James Cerfolio. 1. Department of Epidemiology, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA. abryant@uab.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Examination of factors that may contribute to racial disparity among those with lung cancer has been thwarted by heterogeneous treatment and staging strategies, limited national registry and socioeconomic and follow-up data. This study examines a decades worth of data to better elucidate these factors in a cohort staged or treated using homogeneous algorithms. METHODS: A nested case-control study of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). White patients were matched 4:1 to African American patients on age, gender, comorbidities, performance status, and stage. All patients underwent clinical and pathologic staging by one physician using similar staged-based treatment algorithms. Socioeconomic status was assessed by annual income per capita, insurance status, and education level. The primary outcome was survival rate. RESULTS: Among the 930 patients in this series, African Americans were more likely to be smokers (p < 0.001), have a lower per-capita annual income (p = 0.016), greater delay to treatment (p = 0.023), and less likely to agree to neo-adjuvant therapy (p < 0.001). Whites had better 5-year overall survival than African Americans for stage I (84% versus 78%, p = 0.037), stage II (52% versus 44%, p = 0.041), and stage III (32% versus 20%, p = 0.008) NSCLC. However, this survival advantage disappeared for earlier stages of NSCLC (I and II) when adjusted for socioeconomic status and smoking status. The survival advantage for stage IIIa was lost when adjusted for neo-adjuvant chemoradiotherapy. African American men had the worst survival of all subgroups independent of socioeconomic status. CONCLUSIONS: Given uniform staging, treatment, and socioeconomic status the overall survival rates for African American and White patients with NSLC are similar.
OBJECTIVE: Examination of factors that may contribute to racial disparity among those with lung cancer has been thwarted by heterogeneous treatment and staging strategies, limited national registry and socioeconomic and follow-up data. This study examines a decades worth of data to better elucidate these factors in a cohort staged or treated using homogeneous algorithms. METHODS: A nested case-control study of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). White patients were matched 4:1 to African American patients on age, gender, comorbidities, performance status, and stage. All patients underwent clinical and pathologic staging by one physician using similar staged-based treatment algorithms. Socioeconomic status was assessed by annual income per capita, insurance status, and education level. The primary outcome was survival rate. RESULTS: Among the 930 patients in this series, African Americans were more likely to be smokers (p < 0.001), have a lower per-capita annual income (p = 0.016), greater delay to treatment (p = 0.023), and less likely to agree to neo-adjuvant therapy (p < 0.001). Whites had better 5-year overall survival than African Americans for stage I (84% versus 78%, p = 0.037), stage II (52% versus 44%, p = 0.041), and stage III (32% versus 20%, p = 0.008) NSCLC. However, this survival advantage disappeared for earlier stages of NSCLC (I and II) when adjusted for socioeconomic status and smoking status. The survival advantage for stage IIIa was lost when adjusted for neo-adjuvant chemoradiotherapy. African American men had the worst survival of all subgroups independent of socioeconomic status. CONCLUSIONS: Given uniform staging, treatment, and socioeconomic status the overall survival rates for African American and White patients with NSLC are similar.
Authors: V Bar-Ad; J Palmer; L Li; Y Lai; B Lu; R E Myers; Z Ye; R Axelrod; J M Johnson; M Werner-Wasik; S W Cowan; N R Evans; B T Hehn; C C Solomides; C Wang Journal: Clin Transl Oncol Date: 2016-12-01 Impact factor: 3.405
Authors: Damien J LaPar; Castigliano M Bhamidipati; David A Harris; Benjamin D Kozower; David R Jones; Irving L Kron; Gorav Ailawadi; Christine L Lau Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2011-06-25 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Norma F Kanarek; Craig M Hooker; Luckson Mathieu; Hua-Ling Tsai; Charles M Rudin; James G Herman; Malcolm V Brock Journal: Am J Med Date: 2014-01-28 Impact factor: 4.965
Authors: Christina Brzezniak; Sacha Satram-Hoang; Hans-Peter Goertz; Carolina Reyes; Ashok Gunuganti; Christopher Gallagher; Corey A Carter Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2015-03-25 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Onkar V Khullar; Theresa Gillespie; Dana C Nickleach; Yuan Liu; Kristin Higgins; Suresh Ramalingam; Joseph Lipscomb; Felix G Fernandez Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2014-10-27 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Gregory A Masters; Sarah Temin; Christopher G Azzoli; Giuseppe Giaccone; Sherman Baker; Julie R Brahmer; Peter M Ellis; Ajeet Gajra; Nancy Rackear; Joan H Schiller; Thomas J Smith; John R Strawn; David Trent; David H Johnson Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2015-08-31 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Manali I Patel; Ange Wang; Kristopher Kapphahn; Manisha Desai; Rowan T Chlebowski; Michael S Simon; Chloe E Bird; Giselle Corbie-Smith; Scarlett Lin Gomez; Lucile L Adams-Campbell; Michele L Cote; Marcia L Stefanick; Heather A Wakelee Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2015-12-23 Impact factor: 44.544