Literature DB >> 18594306

Primary radial nerve palsy in patients with acute humeral shaft fractures.

Radford Ekholm1, Sari Ponzer, Hans Törnkvist, Johanna Adami, Jan Tidermark.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The primary aim was to report on the recovery of radial nerve function in patients with acute closed humeral shaft fractures and associated primary radial nerve palsy. The secondary aim was to report on the long-term functional outcome and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with this specific injury.
SETTING: Six major hospitals in Stockholm County.
DESIGN: Descriptive study. Retrospective assessment of radial nerve recovery and fracture healing. Prospective assessment of functional outcome and HRQoL. PATIENTS: Thirty-three patients with acute radial nerve palsy and a closed humeral shaft fracture in a population of 358 patients with 361 humeral shaft fractures. INTERVENTION: Nonoperative or operative treatment as per decision of the attending orthopedic surgeon. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Recovery of the radial nerve, fracture healing, functional outcome according to the Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA) and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH). HRQoL according to Short Form 36 (SF-36).
RESULTS: Among the 18 patients treated nonoperatively, 16 (89%) displayed a complete recovery from their radial nerve palsy while 2 (11%) presented minor sequelae. In 11 (73%) of the 15 patients treated primarily operatively, the nerve function recovered completely while 2 patients (13%) had minor sequelae and 2 (13%) had major sequelae, i.e. 1 partial nerve palsy and 1 total radial nerve palsy. Sixteen patients (48%) were available for assessment of the long-term functional outcome and HRQoL at a mean of 7 years (range, 6 to 8 years). The range of motion and the muscular strength of the injured arm, the functional outcome according to the SMFA, and HRQoL according to the SF-36 showed results comparable to those previously reported for patients with healed humeral shaft fractures without associated radial nerve palsy.
CONCLUSION: This study confirms the high spontaneous recovery rate of primary radial nerve palsies in patients with closed humeral shaft fractures. Primary radial nerve palsy should not be regarded as an isolated indication for primary surgical intervention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18594306     DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e318177eb06

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Trauma        ISSN: 0890-5339            Impact factor:   2.512


  15 in total

1.  Does emergency surgical treatment allow good nerve recovery in humeral diaphyseal fractures associated with radial palsy?

Authors:  Xiaoming Chen; Tang Liu
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-11-14       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Plate osteosynthesis of humeral diaphyseal fractures associated with radial palsy: twenty cases.

Authors:  Regis Pailhé; Virginie Mesquida; Brice Rubens-Duval; Dominique Saragaglia
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-03-28       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Danish version of the Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment questionnaire (SMFA).

Authors:  Marianne Lindahl; Signe Andersen; Annette Joergensen; Christian Frandsen; Liselotte Jensen; Eirikur Benedikz
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2017-07-04       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Neuropathic pain in patients with upper-extremity nerve injury.

Authors:  Christine B Novak; Joel Katz
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2010-07-23       Impact factor: 1.037

5.  Humeral shaft fractures.

Authors:  Andre R Spiguel; Robert J Steffner
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2012-09

6.  Retrospective case series with one year follow-up after radial nerve palsy associated with humeral fractures.

Authors:  Nikolaus Wilhelm Lang; Roman Christian Ostermann; Cathrin Arthold; Julian Joestl; Patrick Platzer
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Humeral Shaft Fractures: Surgical versus Nonsurgical Management in Workers' Compensation.

Authors:  Benjamin A Hendy; Benjamin Zmistowski; Zachary Wells; Joseph A Abboud; Surena Namdari
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2020-11

8.  Medial approach to treat humeral mid-shaft fractures: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Shun Lu; Junwei Wu; Shihong Xu; Baisheng Fu; Jinlei Dong; Yongliang Yang; Guodong Wang; Maoyuan Xin; Qinghu Li; Tong-Chuan He; Fu Wang; Dongsheng Zhou
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 2.359

9.  Open reduction and internal fixation of humeral shaft fractures versus conservative treatment with a functional brace: a study protocol of a randomised controlled trial embedded in a cohort.

Authors:  Lasse Rämö; Simo Taimela; Vesa Lepola; Antti Malmivaara; Tuomas Lähdeoja; Mika Paavola
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-07-09       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  HUMeral shaft fractures: measuring recovery after operative versus non-operative treatment (HUMMER): a multicenter comparative observational study.

Authors:  Kiran C Mahabier; Esther M M Van Lieshout; Hugo W Bolhuis; P Koen Bos; Maarten Wga Bronkhorst; Milko M M Bruijninckx; Jeroen De Haan; Axel R Deenik; Boudewijn J Dwars; Martin G Eversdijk; J Carel Goslings; Robert Haverlag; Martin J Heetveld; Albert J H Kerver; Karel A Kolkman; Peter A Leenhouts; Sven A G Meylaerts; Ron Onstenk; Martijn Poeze; Rudolf W Poolman; Bas J Punt; W Herbert Roerdink; Gert R Roukema; Jan Bernard Sintenie; Nicolaj M R Soesman; Andras K F Tanka; Edgar J T Ten Holder; Maarten Van der Elst; Frank H W M Van der Heijden; Frits M Van der Linden; Peer Van der Zwaal; Jan P Van Dijk; Hans-Peter W Van Jonbergen; Egbert J M M Verleisdonk; Jos P A M Vroemen; Marco Waleboer; Philippe Wittich; Wietse P Zuidema; Suzanne Polinder; Michael H J Verhofstad; Dennis Den Hartog
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2014-02-11       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.