OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the biomechanical properties of bicortical with unicortical screws in a proximal tibial fracture cadaveric model. SETTING: Biomechanics laboratory at a Level 1 trauma center. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Eight pairs (4 male and 4 female) of elderly (average age, 79 years; range, 63 to 104 years) cadaveric tibiae. INTERVENTION: Osteotomies were performed in the proximal tibia to reproduce a 41-C2 bicondylar fracture pattern. The 4.5-mm proximal tibial periarticular locking plates (Smith-Nephew, Memphis, TN) were applied to the tibiae with 4 proximal bicortical or unicortical locking screws and 3 screws distal to the fracture site. The fixed tibiae were tested by using a materials testing machine (Instron, Canton, MA) with the axial load on the medial condyle. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: The bicortical and unicortical constructs were compared for stiffness, yield load and displacement, and maximum load and displacement to failure. RESULTS: : Bicortical screw placement significantly outperformed unicortical screw placement in stiffness (53.1 +/- 6.7 N/mm versus 35.6 +/- 7.2 N/mm, P < 0.002) and maximum load (476.5 +/- 83.8 N versus 258.9 +/- 62.1 N, P < 0.001) but the yield properties and the ultimate displacement were not significantly different. CONCLUSION: Bicortical screw placement may provide a biomechanically superior construct than unicortical screw placement for the stabilization of unstable proximal tibia fractures.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the biomechanical properties of bicortical with unicortical screws in a proximal tibial fracture cadaveric model. SETTING: Biomechanics laboratory at a Level 1 trauma center. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Eight pairs (4 male and 4 female) of elderly (average age, 79 years; range, 63 to 104 years) cadaveric tibiae. INTERVENTION: Osteotomies were performed in the proximal tibia to reproduce a 41-C2 bicondylar fracture pattern. The 4.5-mm proximal tibial periarticular locking plates (Smith-Nephew, Memphis, TN) were applied to the tibiae with 4 proximal bicortical or unicortical locking screws and 3 screws distal to the fracture site. The fixed tibiae were tested by using a materials testing machine (Instron, Canton, MA) with the axial load on the medial condyle. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: The bicortical and unicortical constructs were compared for stiffness, yield load and displacement, and maximum load and displacement to failure. RESULTS: : Bicortical screw placement significantly outperformed unicortical screw placement in stiffness (53.1 +/- 6.7 N/mm versus 35.6 +/- 7.2 N/mm, P < 0.002) and maximum load (476.5 +/- 83.8 N versus 258.9 +/- 62.1 N, P < 0.001) but the yield properties and the ultimate displacement were not significantly different. CONCLUSION: Bicortical screw placement may provide a biomechanically superior construct than unicortical screw placement for the stabilization of unstable proximal tibia fractures.
Authors: Matthieu Ehlinger; Benjamin Scheibling; Michel Rahme; David Brinkert; Benoit Schenck; Antonio Di Marco; Philippe Adam; François Bonnomet Journal: Int Orthop Date: 2015-08-08 Impact factor: 3.075
Authors: Serafino Carta; Mattia Fortina; Alberto Riva; Luigi Meccariello; Enrico Manzi; Antonio Di Giovanni; Paolo Ferrata Journal: Adv Med Date: 2016-11-20
Authors: Saqib Hasan; Omri B Ayalon; Richard S Yoon; Amit Sood; Ulises Militano; Mark Cavanaugh; Frank A Liporace Journal: J Orthop Traumatol Date: 2013-11-26
Authors: Martin C Jordan; Christina Zimmermann; Sheridan A Gho; Soenke P Frey; Torsten Blunk; Rainer H Meffert; Stefanie Hoelscher-Doht Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2016-07-15 Impact factor: 2.362