Literature DB >> 18594004

Patients with ERCC1-negative locally advanced esophageal cancers may benefit from preoperative chemoradiotherapy.

Min Kyoung Kim1, Kyung-Ja Cho, Gui Young Kwon, Seung-Il Park, Yong Hee Kim, Jong Hoon Kim, Ho-Young Song, Ji Hoon Shin, Hwoon Yong Jung, Gin Hyug Lee, Kee Don Choi, Sung-Bae Kim.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the significance of excision repair cross-complementation group 1 (ERCC1) expression as a predictive marker, we analyzed the effects of preoperative chemoradiotherapy on survival relative to ERCC1 status in patients with locally advanced operable esophageal cancer. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: Paraffin-embedded pretreatment tumor specimens, collected by endoscopic biopsy from patients treated with surgery alone or with preoperative chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery, were immunohistochemically assayed for ERCC1 expression.
RESULTS: Of the 175 patients, 152 biopsy specimens were available for immunohistochemical analysis. Based on a median ERCC1 expression score of 1, we divided the samples into ERCC1-positive (score >1; 71 patients, 47%) and ERCC1-negative (score </=1; 81 patients, 53%) groups. No differences in patient and disease characteristics were observed between the two groups. However, among patients with ERCC1-negative tumors, those who received preoperative chemoradiotherapy had longer overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) than those treated with esophagectomy alone (median OS, 59.2 versus 25.4 months, P = 0.057; median EFS, 50.7 versus 19.7 months, P = 0.042). This difference was not observed among patients with ERCC1-positive tumors. In multivariate analysis, treatment modality was the major determinant of both EFS (P = 0.006) and OS (P = 0.008) for patients with ERCC1-negative tumors, whereas Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status was the only significant predictor of outcome among ERCC1-positive patients. Among patients who received esophagectomy alone, those with ERCC1-positive tumors had a tendency toward longer OS and EFS (P = 0.085 and 0.094, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with ERCC1-negative operable esophageal tumors show a greater benefit from preoperative chemoradiotherapy followed by esophagectomy than those who undergo esophagectomy alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18594004     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-4848

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  21 in total

1.  Neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy in adenocarcinoma of the esophagus: ERCC1 gene polymorphisms for prediction of response and prognosis.

Authors:  Ralf Metzger; Ute Warnecke-Eberz; Hakan Alakus; Fabian Kütting; Jan Brabender; Daniel Vallböhmer; Peter P Grimminger; Stefan P Mönig; Uta Drebber; Arnulf H Hölscher; Elfriede Bollschweiler
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 2.  Opportunities and challenges facing biomarker development for personalized head and neck cancer treatment.

Authors:  Alexandra Lucs; Benjamin Saltman; Christine H Chung; Bettie M Steinberg; David L Schwartz
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2012-01-27       Impact factor: 3.147

3.  ERCC1 and XRCC1 gene polymorphisms predict response to neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy in esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Ute Warnecke-Eberz; Daniel Vallböhmer; Hakan Alakus; Fabian Kütting; Georg Lurje; Elfriede Bollschweiler; Anke Wienand-Dorweiler; Uta Drebber; Arnulf H Hölscher; Ralf Metzger
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-05-07       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 4.  Targeting DNA repair in cancer: current state and novel approaches.

Authors:  Apostolos Klinakis; Dimitris Karagiannis; Theodoros Rampias
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2019-10-14       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 5.  Biomarkers for predicting the response of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma to neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy.

Authors:  Hiroshi Okumura; Yasuto Uchikado; Tetsuro Setoyama; Masataka Matsumoto; Tetsuhiro Owaki; Sumiya Ishigami; Shoji Natsugoe
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2013-04-19       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 6.  Current strategies in chemoradiation for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Shane Lloyd; Bryan W Chang
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2014-06

7.  Prognostic value of ERCC1 in head and neck carcinoma treated with definitive or adjuvant radiotherapy.

Authors:  Vesna Bišof; Antonija Jakovčević; Sven Seiwerth; Zoran Rakušić; Slavko Gašparov
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 4.553

8.  Decreased transcription-coupled nucleotide excision repair capacity is associated with increased p53- and MLH1-independent apoptosis in response to cisplatin.

Authors:  Lawton J Stubbert; Jennifer M Smith; Bruce C McKay
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  Cisplatin pharmacogenetics, DNA repair polymorphisms, and esophageal cancer outcomes.

Authors:  Penelope A Bradbury; Matthew H Kulke; Rebecca S Heist; Wei Zhou; Clement Ma; Wei Xu; Ariela L Marshall; Rihong Zhai; Susanne M Hooshmand; Kofi Asomaning; Li Su; Frances A Shepherd; Thomas J Lynch; John C Wain; David C Christiani; Geoffrey Liu
Journal:  Pharmacogenet Genomics       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 2.089

10.  Comparison of survival among neoadjuvant chemoradiation responders, non-responders and patients receiving primary resection for locally advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma: does neoadjuvant chemoradiation benefit all?

Authors:  Po-Kuei Hsu; Ling-I Chien; Chien-Sheng Huang; Chih-Cheng Hsieh; Yu-Chung Wu; Wen-Hu Hsu; Teh-Ying Chou
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2013-05-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.