PURPOSE: Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression is a critical component in tumor growth and metastasis. Capabilities to monitor VEGF expression in vivo can potentially serve as a useful tool for diagnosis, prognosis, treatment planning, monitoring, and research. Here, we present the first report of in vivo hyperspectral molecular imaging strategy capable of monitoring treatment-induced changes in VEGF expression. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: VEGF was targeted with an anti-VEGF antibody conjugated with a fluorescent dye and was imaged in vivo using a hyperspectral imaging system. The strategy was validated by quantitatively monitoring VEGF levels in three different tumors as well as following photodynamic treatment. Specificity of the molecular imaging strategy was tested using in vivo competition experiments and mathematically using a quantitative pharmacokinetic model. RESULTS: The molecular imaging strategy successfully imaged VEGF levels quantitatively in three different tumors and showed concordance with results from standard ELISA. Changes in tumoral VEGF concentration following photodynamic treatment and Avastin treatment were shown. Immunohistochemistry shows that (a) the VEGF-specific contrast agent labels both proteoglycan-bound and unbound VEGF in the extracellular space and (b) the bound VEGF is released from the extracellular matrix in response to photodynamic therapy. In vivo competition experiments and quantitative pharmacokinetic model-based analysis confirmed the high specificity of the imaging strategy. CONCLUSION: This first report of in vivo quantitative optical molecular imaging-based monitoring of a secreted cytokine in tumors may have implications in providing tools for mechanistic investigations as well as for improved treatment design and merits further investigation.
PURPOSE:Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression is a critical component in tumor growth and metastasis. Capabilities to monitor VEGF expression in vivo can potentially serve as a useful tool for diagnosis, prognosis, treatment planning, monitoring, and research. Here, we present the first report of in vivo hyperspectral molecular imaging strategy capable of monitoring treatment-induced changes in VEGF expression. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN:VEGF was targeted with an anti-VEGF antibody conjugated with a fluorescent dye and was imaged in vivo using a hyperspectral imaging system. The strategy was validated by quantitatively monitoring VEGF levels in three different tumors as well as following photodynamic treatment. Specificity of the molecular imaging strategy was tested using in vivo competition experiments and mathematically using a quantitative pharmacokinetic model. RESULTS: The molecular imaging strategy successfully imaged VEGF levels quantitatively in three different tumors and showed concordance with results from standard ELISA. Changes in tumoralVEGF concentration following photodynamic treatment and Avastin treatment were shown. Immunohistochemistry shows that (a) the VEGF-specific contrast agent labels both proteoglycan-bound and unbound VEGF in the extracellular space and (b) the bound VEGF is released from the extracellular matrix in response to photodynamic therapy. In vivo competition experiments and quantitative pharmacokinetic model-based analysis confirmed the high specificity of the imaging strategy. CONCLUSION: This first report of in vivo quantitative optical molecular imaging-based monitoring of a secreted cytokine in tumors may have implications in providing tools for mechanistic investigations as well as for improved treatment design and merits further investigation.
Authors: P B Vermeulen; G Gasparini; S B Fox; C Colpaert; L P Marson; M Gion; J A M Beliën; R M W de Waal; E Van Marck; E Magnani; N Weidner; A L Harris; L Y Dirix Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2002-08 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: D H Gorski; M A Beckett; N T Jaskowiak; D P Calvin; H J Mauceri; R M Salloum; S Seetharam; A Koons; D M Hari; D W Kufe; R R Weichselbaum Journal: Cancer Res Date: 1999-07-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: David H Gorski; Helena J Mauceri; Rabih M Salloum; Arielle Halpern; Saraswathy Seetharam; Ralph R Weichselbaum Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2003-01-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Alok A Khorana; Charlotte K Ryan; Christopher Cox; Shirley Eberly; Deepak M Sahasrabudhe Journal: Cancer Date: 2003-02-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Jonathan P Celli; Bryan Q Spring; Imran Rizvi; Conor L Evans; Kimberley S Samkoe; Sarika Verma; Brian W Pogue; Tayyaba Hasan Journal: Chem Rev Date: 2010-05-12 Impact factor: 60.622
Authors: Amy M Winkler; Photini F S Rice; Jan Weichsel; Jennifer M Watson; Marina V Backer; Joseph M Backer; Jennifer K Barton Journal: Mol Imaging Biol Date: 2011-12 Impact factor: 3.488
Authors: Nrusingh C Biswal; John K Gamelin; Baohong Yuan; Marina V Backer; Joseph M Backer; Quing Zhu Journal: J Biomed Opt Date: 2010 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 3.170
Authors: Imran Rizvi; Sriram Anbil; Nermina Alagic; Jonathan Celli; Jonathan P Celli; Lei Zak Zheng; Akilan Palanisami; Michael D Glidden; Brian W Pogue; Tayyaba Hasan Journal: Photochem Photobiol Date: 2013-04-04 Impact factor: 3.421
Authors: Heling Zhou; Kate Luby-Phelps; Bruce E Mickey; Amyn A Habib; Ralph P Mason; Dawen Zhao Journal: PLoS One Date: 2009-11-30 Impact factor: 3.240