PURPOSE: Somatic mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene occur in a subset of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and are highly predictive of the clinical response to selective EGFR kinase inhibitors. The prevalence of EGFR-mutant NSCLC is appreciably higher in females than in males and in East Asian than in Caucasian populations. We hypothesized that these disparate frequencies may be attributable to underlying genetic modifiers. Given the coincident differences in sex and ethnic origin, we tested allozymatic variants of enzymes involved in estrogen biosynthesis and metabolism, encoded by polymorphic alleles known to differ in frequency between Caucasian and Asian populations, as modifying alleles. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We genotyped nine polymorphisms in the CYP1A1, CYP17A1, CYP19, HSD17B1, COMT, GSTM1, and GSTT1 genes, in a series of 100 Japanese NSCLCs, selected for equal representation of EGFR wild-type (wt) and EGFR-mutant cases, as well as male and female cases. Associations between polymorphic variants and the EGFR genotype and sex of NSCLC cases were examined using Fisher's exact test of significance. RESULTS: Only CYP1A1 2C showed a difference in allele frequency that approached statistical significance. Heterozygotes were underrepresented among EGFR-mutant cases compared with EGFR-wt cases (27% versus 47%, P = 0.08), with a concurrent trend toward overrepresentation of CYP1A1 2C(Ile/Ile) homozygotes among EGFR-mutant cases as compared with EGFR-wt cases (69% versus 51%, P = 0.13). CONCLUSION: Within the power of this study, our findings suggest that the selected polymorphic variants in the estrogen biosynthesis and metabolism pathways are unlikely to be major genetic modifiers of the prevalence of EGFR-mutant NSCLC.
PURPOSE: Somatic mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene occur in a subset of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and are highly predictive of the clinical response to selective EGFR kinase inhibitors. The prevalence of EGFR-mutant NSCLC is appreciably higher in females than in males and in East Asian than in Caucasian populations. We hypothesized that these disparate frequencies may be attributable to underlying genetic modifiers. Given the coincident differences in sex and ethnic origin, we tested allozymatic variants of enzymes involved in estrogen biosynthesis and metabolism, encoded by polymorphic alleles known to differ in frequency between Caucasian and Asian populations, as modifying alleles. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We genotyped nine polymorphisms in the CYP1A1, CYP17A1, CYP19, HSD17B1, COMT, GSTM1, and GSTT1 genes, in a series of 100 Japanese NSCLCs, selected for equal representation of EGFR wild-type (wt) and EGFR-mutant cases, as well as male and female cases. Associations between polymorphic variants and the EGFR genotype and sex of NSCLC cases were examined using Fisher's exact test of significance. RESULTS: Only CYP1A1 2C showed a difference in allele frequency that approached statistical significance. Heterozygotes were underrepresented among EGFR-mutant cases compared with EGFR-wt cases (27% versus 47%, P = 0.08), with a concurrent trend toward overrepresentation of CYP1A1 2C(Ile/Ile) homozygotes among EGFR-mutant cases as compared with EGFR-wt cases (69% versus 51%, P = 0.13). CONCLUSION: Within the power of this study, our findings suggest that the selected polymorphic variants in the estrogen biosynthesis and metabolism pathways are unlikely to be major genetic modifiers of the prevalence of EGFR-mutant NSCLC.
Authors: Montserrat García-Closas; Julie Herbstman; Mark Schiffman; Andrew Glass; Joanne F Dorgan Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2002-11-10 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Timo Salmen; Anna-Mari Heikkinen; Anitta Mahonen; Heikki Kröger; Marja Komulainen; Heli Pallonen; Seppo Saarikoski; Risto Honkanen; Pekka H Mäenpää Journal: Ann Med Date: 2003 Impact factor: 4.709
Authors: William Pao; Vincent Miller; Maureen Zakowski; Jennifer Doherty; Katerina Politi; Inderpal Sarkaria; Bhuvanesh Singh; Robert Heelan; Valerie Rusch; Lucinda Fulton; Elaine Mardis; Doris Kupfer; Richard Wilson; Mark Kris; Harold Varmus Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2004-08-25 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Veronica Wendy Setiawan; Susan E Hankinson; Graham A Colditz; David J Hunter; Immaculata De Vivo Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2004-02 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: J Guillermo Paez; Pasi A Jänne; Jeffrey C Lee; Sean Tracy; Heidi Greulich; Stacey Gabriel; Paula Herman; Frederic J Kaye; Neal Lindeman; Titus J Boggon; Katsuhiko Naoki; Hidefumi Sasaki; Yoshitaka Fujii; Michael J Eck; William R Sellers; Bruce E Johnson; Matthew Meyerson Journal: Science Date: 2004-04-29 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Thomas J Lynch; Daphne W Bell; Raffaella Sordella; Sarada Gurubhagavatula; Ross A Okimoto; Brian W Brannigan; Patricia L Harris; Sara M Haserlat; Jeffrey G Supko; Frank G Haluska; David N Louis; David C Christiani; Jeff Settleman; Daniel A Haber Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-04-29 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Shelley S Tworoger; Jessica Chubak; Erin J Aiello; Cornelia M Ulrich; Charlotte Atkinson; John D Potter; Yutaka Yasui; Patricia L Stapleton; Johanna W Lampe; Federico M Farin; Frank Z Stanczyk; Anne McTiernan Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2004-01 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Vei Mah; Diana Marquez; Mohammad Alavi; Erin L Maresh; Li Zhang; Nam Yoon; Steve Horvath; Lora Bagryanova; Michael C Fishbein; David Chia; Richard Pietras; Lee Goodglick Journal: Lung Cancer Date: 2011-04-20 Impact factor: 5.705
Authors: Qiao-Yang Sun; Ling-Wen Ding; Jin-Fen Xiao; Wenwen Chien; Su-Lin Lim; Norimichi Hattori; Lee Goodglick; David Chia; Vei Mah; Mohammad Alavi; Sara R Kim; Ngan B Doan; Jonathan W Said; Xin-Yi Loh; Liang Xu; Li-Zhen Liu; Henry Yang; Takahide Hayano; Shuo Shi; Dong Xie; De-Chen Lin; H Phillip Koeffler Journal: J Pathol Date: 2014-12-18 Impact factor: 7.996
Authors: Kyung Rae Cho; Min Ho Lee; Doo-Sik Kong; Ho Jun Seol; Do-Hyun Nam; Jong-Mu Sun; Jin Seok Ahn; Myung-Ju Ahn; Keunchil Park; Sung Tae Kim; Do Hun Lim; Jung-Il Lee Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2015-09-15 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Tae Hoon Roh; Mi Sun Choi; Namkyu You; Donghwan Jeong; Ae Hwa Jang; Mi Ra Seo; Sang Ryul Lee; Se-Hyuk Kim Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2018-01-11 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Charlene Jin Yee Liew; Lester Chee Hao Leong; Lynette Li San Teo; Ching Ching Ong; Foong Koon Cheah; Wei Ping Tham; Haja Mohamed Mohideen Salahudeen; Chau Hung Lee; Gregory Jon Leng Kaw; Augustine Kim Huat Tee; Ian Yu Yan Tsou; Kiang Hiong Tay; Raymond Quah; Bien Peng Tan; Hong Chou; Daniel Tan; Angeline Choo Choo Poh; Andrew Gee Seng Tan Journal: Singapore Med J Date: 2019-11 Impact factor: 1.858
Authors: Sheila E Taube; Gary M Clark; Janet E Dancey; Lisa M McShane; Caroline C Sigman; Steven I Gutman Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2009-10-23 Impact factor: 13.506