PURPOSE: Metaplastic carcinomas are distinct invasive breast carcinomas with aberrant nonglandular differentiation, which may be spindle, squamous, or chondroid. The limited effective treatments result from the lack of knowledge of its molecular etiology. Given the role of the Wnt pathway in cell fate and in the development of breast cancer, we hypothesized that defects in this pathway may contribute to the development of metaplastic carcinomas. DESIGN: In 36 primary metaplastic carcinomas, we comprehensively determined the prevalence of and mechanism underlying beta-catenin and Wnt pathway deregulation using immunohistochemistry for beta-catenin expression and localization and mutational analysis for CTNNB1 (encoding beta-catenin), APC, WISP3, AXIN1, and AXIN2 genes. By immunohistochemistry, normal beta-catenin was seen as membrane staining, and it was aberrant when >5% of tumor cells had nuclear or cytoplasmic accumulation or reduced membrane staining. RESULTS: By immunohistochemistry, aberrant beta-catenin was present in 33 of 36 (92%) cases, revealing deregulation of the Wnt pathway. CTNNB1 missense mutations were detected in 7 of 27 (25.9%) tumors available for mutation analyses. All mutations affected the NH(2)-terminal domain of beta-catenin, presumably rendering the mutant protein resistant to degradation. Two of 27 (7.4%) tumors had mutations of APC, and 5 (18.5%) carried a frame shift mutation of WISP3. No AXIN1 or AXIN2 mutations were found. CONCLUSIONS: Activation of the Wnt signaling pathway is common in this specific subtype of breast carcinoma. The discovery of CTNNB1, APC, and WISP3 mutations may result in new treatments for patients with metaplastic carcinomas of the breast.
PURPOSE:Metaplastic carcinomas are distinct invasive breast carcinomas with aberrant nonglandular differentiation, which may be spindle, squamous, or chondroid. The limited effective treatments result from the lack of knowledge of its molecular etiology. Given the role of the Wnt pathway in cell fate and in the development of breast cancer, we hypothesized that defects in this pathway may contribute to the development of metaplastic carcinomas. DESIGN: In 36 primary metaplastic carcinomas, we comprehensively determined the prevalence of and mechanism underlying beta-catenin and Wnt pathway deregulation using immunohistochemistry for beta-catenin expression and localization and mutational analysis for CTNNB1 (encoding beta-catenin), APC, WISP3, AXIN1, and AXIN2 genes. By immunohistochemistry, normal beta-catenin was seen as membrane staining, and it was aberrant when >5% of tumor cells had nuclear or cytoplasmic accumulation or reduced membrane staining. RESULTS: By immunohistochemistry, aberrant beta-catenin was present in 33 of 36 (92%) cases, revealing deregulation of the Wnt pathway. CTNNB1 missense mutations were detected in 7 of 27 (25.9%) tumors available for mutation analyses. All mutations affected the NH(2)-terminal domain of beta-catenin, presumably rendering the mutant protein resistant to degradation. Two of 27 (7.4%) tumors had mutations of APC, and 5 (18.5%) carried a frame shift mutation of WISP3. No AXIN1 or AXIN2 mutations were found. CONCLUSIONS: Activation of the Wnt signaling pathway is common in this specific subtype of breast carcinoma. The discovery of CTNNB1, APC, and WISP3 mutations may result in new treatments for patients with metaplastic carcinomas of the breast.
Authors: A Cano; M A Pérez-Moreno; I Rodrigo; A Locascio; M J Blanco; M G del Barrio; F Portillo; M A Nieto Journal: Nat Cell Biol Date: 2000-02 Impact factor: 28.824
Authors: E Batlle; E Sancho; C Francí; D Domínguez; M Monfar; J Baulida; A García De Herreros Journal: Nat Cell Biol Date: 2000-02 Impact factor: 28.824
Authors: Susan C Abraham; Carol Reynolds; Jae-Hyuk Lee; Elizabeth A Montgomery; Blaire L Baisden; Alyssa M Krasinskas; Tsung-Teh Wu Journal: Hum Pathol Date: 2002-01 Impact factor: 3.466
Authors: S Y Lin; W Xia; J C Wang; K Y Kwong; B Spohn; Y Wen; R G Pestell; M C Hung Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2000-04-11 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Jong In Yook; Xiao-Yan Li; Ichiro Ota; Casey Hu; Hyun Sil Kim; Nam Hee Kim; So Young Cha; Joo Kyung Ryu; Yoon Jung Choi; Jin Kim; Eric R Fearon; Stephen J Weiss Journal: Nat Cell Biol Date: 2006-10-29 Impact factor: 28.824
Authors: Celina G Kleer; Yanhong Zhang; Quintin Pan; Kenneth L van Golen; Zhi-Fen Wu; D Livant; Sofia D Merajver Journal: Oncogene Date: 2002-05-09 Impact factor: 9.867
Authors: Brian D Lehmann; Joshua A Bauer; Xi Chen; Melinda E Sanders; A Bapsi Chakravarthy; Yu Shyr; Jennifer A Pietenpol Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2011-07 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Charlotte K Y Ng; Salvatore Piscuoglio; Felipe C Geyer; Kathleen A Burke; Fresia Pareja; Carey A Eberle; Raymond S Lim; Rachael Natrajan; Nadeem Riaz; Odette Mariani; Larry Norton; Anne Vincent-Salomon; Y Hannah Wen; Britta Weigelt; Jorge S Reis-Filho Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2017-02-02 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Felipe C Geyer; Fresia Pareja; Britta Weigelt; Emad Rakha; Ian O Ellis; Stuart J Schnitt; Jorge S Reis-Filho Journal: Am J Pathol Date: 2017-07-20 Impact factor: 4.307
Authors: C Christofer Juhlin; Nimrod B Kiss; Andrea Villablanca; Felix Haglund; Jörgen Nordenström; Anders Höög; Catharina Larsson Journal: PLoS One Date: 2010-03-01 Impact factor: 3.240