OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to develop and validate a population pharmacokinetic model for nevirapine in a population of HIV-infected adults and to evaluate the influence of nevirapine dosing regimen and patient characteristics on nevirapine trough concentration. METHODS: HIV-infected adults receiving oral nevirapine for at least 4 weeks were included. A concentration-time profile was obtained for each patient, and nevirapine concentrations in plasma were determined by HPLC. Pharmacokinetic parameters, inter-individual variability and residual error were estimated using non-linear mixed effects modelling. The influence of patient characteristics on the pharmacokinetics of nevirapine was explored, and the predictive performance of the final model was evaluated in an external data set of observations. RESULTS: Totals of 40 and 18 Caucasian patients were included in two data sets for model building and model validation, respectively. A mono-compartmental model with first-order absorption and elimination best described the pharmacokinetics of nevirapine. Body weight influenced oral clearance (CL/F) and volume of distribution (V/F). The estimated population pharmacokinetic parameters (inter-individual variability) for an individual weighing 70 kg were CL/F 2.95 L/h (24%), V/F 95.2 L (30%) and k(a) 1.8 h(-1) (96%). The final model predicted nevirapine concentrations in the external model-validation data set with no systematic bias and adequate precision. Bayesian estimates of nevirapine trough concentrations were lower when nevirapine was administered once instead of twice daily, and nearly half of the patients weighing 90 kg had drug concentrations <3.0 mg/L when nevirapine was dosed once daily. CONCLUSIONS: A population model to describe the pharmacokinetics of nevirapine was developed and validated in HIV-infected patients. Body weight influenced CL/F and V/F. Based on Bayesian estimates of individual nevirapine concentrations, twice- instead of once-daily administration of nevirapine would be more optimal in patients weighing >70 kg.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to develop and validate a population pharmacokinetic model for nevirapine in a population of HIV-infected adults and to evaluate the influence of nevirapine dosing regimen and patient characteristics on nevirapine trough concentration. METHODS:HIV-infected adults receiving oral nevirapine for at least 4 weeks were included. A concentration-time profile was obtained for each patient, and nevirapine concentrations in plasma were determined by HPLC. Pharmacokinetic parameters, inter-individual variability and residual error were estimated using non-linear mixed effects modelling. The influence of patient characteristics on the pharmacokinetics of nevirapine was explored, and the predictive performance of the final model was evaluated in an external data set of observations. RESULTS: Totals of 40 and 18 Caucasian patients were included in two data sets for model building and model validation, respectively. A mono-compartmental model with first-order absorption and elimination best described the pharmacokinetics of nevirapine. Body weight influenced oral clearance (CL/F) and volume of distribution (V/F). The estimated population pharmacokinetic parameters (inter-individual variability) for an individual weighing 70 kg were CL/F 2.95 L/h (24%), V/F 95.2 L (30%) and k(a) 1.8 h(-1) (96%). The final model predicted nevirapine concentrations in the external model-validation data set with no systematic bias and adequate precision. Bayesian estimates of nevirapine trough concentrations were lower when nevirapine was administered once instead of twice daily, and nearly half of the patients weighing 90 kg had drug concentrations <3.0 mg/L when nevirapine was dosed once daily. CONCLUSIONS: A population model to describe the pharmacokinetics of nevirapine was developed and validated in HIV-infectedpatients. Body weight influenced CL/F and V/F. Based on Bayesian estimates of individual nevirapine concentrations, twice- instead of once-daily administration of nevirapine would be more optimal in patients weighing >70 kg.
Authors: Elin Svensson; Jan-Stefan van der Walt; Karen I Barnes; Karen Cohen; Tamara Kredo; Alwin Huitema; Jean B Nachega; Mats O Karlsson; Paolo Denti Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2012-09 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: Betty J Dong; Yu Zheng; Michael D Hughes; Adam Frymoyer; Davide Verotta; Patricia Lizak; Frederick Sawe; Judith S Currier; Shahin Lockman; Francesca T Aweeka Journal: AIDS Date: 2012-04-24 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Mina Nikanjam; Desiré Kabamba; Tim R Cressey; David Burger; Francesca T Aweeka; Edward P Acosta; Stephen A Spector; Edmund V Capparelli Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2012-08-06 Impact factor: 5.191