Literature DB >> 18593396

A prospective study of blanchable erythema among university hospital patients.

Chie Konishi1, Junko Sugama, Hiromi Sanada, Mayumi Okuwa, Chizuko Konya, Tomoe Nishizawa, Kimi Shimamura.   

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the predictive accuracy and factors deteriorating blanchable erythema. A prospective cohort study was conducted in a 832-bed university hospital in Japan. Skin condition, risk factors, care plans and practices were measured everyday for 4 weeks by direct assessments and chart review by research staff. Blanchable erythema developed in 62 (24.9%) and a pressure ulcer in 8 (3.2%) patients. Six of the 62 blanchable erythema patients worsened to pressure ulcer of either stage I or II. Calculating the accuracy of blanchable erythema for predicting pressure ulcer development, sensitivity was 75%, specificity 77% and positive likelihood ratio 3.26. The factors found to deteriorate blanchable erythema were K-scale 'pressure' and inadequate support surface management to a patient whose condition was deteriorating. These results suggested that the value of positive likelihood ratio means small effect to the clinical use. However, if adequate support surface management were implemented to blanchable erythema patients, the incidence of pressure ulcer would probably fall to 0.8%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18593396      PMCID: PMC7951692          DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2007.00380.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Wound J        ISSN: 1742-4801            Impact factor:   3.315


  9 in total

1.  Skin alterations of intact skin and risk factors associated with pressure ulcer development in surgical patients: a cohort study.

Authors:  Jane Nixon; Gillian Cranny; Senga Bond
Journal:  Int J Nurs Stud       Date:  2006-04-24       Impact factor: 5.837

2.  Skin disorders and moisture in incontinent nursing home residents: intervention implications.

Authors:  J F Schnelle; G M Adamson; P A Cruise; N al-Samarrai; F C Sarbaugh; G Uman; J G Ouslander
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 5.562

3.  Prognosis of stage I pressure ulcers and related factors.

Authors:  Miwa Sato; Hiromi Sanada; Chizuko Konya; Junko Sugama; Gojiro Nakagami
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.315

4.  Histopathology of the decubitus ulcer.

Authors:  J A Witkowski; L C Parish
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 11.527

5.  Altered skin blood perfusion in areas with non blanchable erythema: an explorative study.

Authors:  Margareta Lindgren; Lars-Ake Malmqvist; Folke Sjöberg; Anna-Christina Ek
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.315

6.  Randomized clinical trial comparing 2 support surfaces: results of the Prevention of Pressure Ulcers Study.

Authors:  Linda J Russell; Tim M Reynolds; Carol Park; Shyam Rithalia; M Gonsalkorale; Jan Birch; David Torgerson; Cynthia Iglesias
Journal:  Adv Skin Wound Care       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.347

Review 7.  Pressure ulcer classification: defining early skin damage.

Authors:  Linda Russell
Journal:  Br J Nurs       Date:  2002-09

8.  Accuracy of physical examination in the diagnosis of hypothyroidism: a cross-sectional, double-blind study.

Authors:  R Indra; S S Patil; R Joshi; M Pai; S P Kalantri
Journal:  J Postgrad Med       Date:  2004 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.476

9.  Pressure ulcer risk factors among hospitalized patients with activity limitation.

Authors:  R M Allman; P S Goode; M M Patrick; N Burst; A A Bartolucci
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995-03-15       Impact factor: 56.272

  9 in total
  1 in total

1.  Incidence and predicted risk factors of pressure ulcers in surgical patients: experience at a medical center in Taipei, Taiwan.

Authors:  Ling Fu Shaw; Pao-Chu Chang; Jung-Fen Lee; Huei-Yu Kung; Tao-Hsin Tung
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 3.411

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.