C J Uneke1. 1. Department of Medical Microbiology/Parasitology, Faculty of Clinical Medicine, Ebonyi State University, Abakaliki, Nigeria. unekecj@yahoo.com
Abstract
BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: Malaria and typhoid fever still remain diseases of major public health importance in the tropics. Individuals in areas endemic for both the diseases are at substantial risk of contracting both these diseases, either concurrently or an acute infection superimposed on a chronic one. The objective of this report was to systematically review scientific data from studies conducted in the tropics on concurrent malaria and typhoid fever within the last two decades (1987-2007), to highlight the diagnostic challenges and the public health implications. METHODS: Using the MedLine Entrez-PubMed search, relevant publications were identified for the review via the key words Malaria and Typhoid fever, which yielded 287 entries as of January 2008. RESULTS: Most of the studies reviewed expressed concern that poor diagnosis continues to hinder effective control of concurrent malaria and typhoid fever in the tropics due to: non-specific clinical presentation of the diseases; high prevalence of asymptomatic infections; lack of resources and insufficient access to trained health care providers and facilities; and widespread practice of self-treatment for clinically suspected malaria or typhoid fever. INTERPRETATION & CONCLUSION: There were considerably higher rates of concurrent malaria and typhoid fever by Widal test compared to the bacteriological culture technique. Although culture technique remains the gold standard in typhoid fever diagnosis, Widal test is still of significant diagnostic value provided judicious interpretation of the test is made against a background of pertinent information. Malaria could be controlled through interventions to minimize human-vector contact, while improved personal hygiene, targeted vaccination campaigns and intensive community health education could help to control typhoid fever in the tropics.
BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES:Malaria and typhoid fever still remain diseases of major public health importance in the tropics. Individuals in areas endemic for both the diseases are at substantial risk of contracting both these diseases, either concurrently or an acute infection superimposed on a chronic one. The objective of this report was to systematically review scientific data from studies conducted in the tropics on concurrent malaria and typhoid fever within the last two decades (1987-2007), to highlight the diagnostic challenges and the public health implications. METHODS: Using the MedLine Entrez-PubMed search, relevant publications were identified for the review via the key words Malaria and Typhoid fever, which yielded 287 entries as of January 2008. RESULTS: Most of the studies reviewed expressed concern that poor diagnosis continues to hinder effective control of concurrent malaria and typhoid fever in the tropics due to: non-specific clinical presentation of the diseases; high prevalence of asymptomatic infections; lack of resources and insufficient access to trained health care providers and facilities; and widespread practice of self-treatment for clinically suspected malaria or typhoid fever. INTERPRETATION & CONCLUSION: There were considerably higher rates of concurrent malaria and typhoid fever by Widal test compared to the bacteriological culture technique. Although culture technique remains the gold standard in typhoid fever diagnosis, Widal test is still of significant diagnostic value provided judicious interpretation of the test is made against a background of pertinent information. Malaria could be controlled through interventions to minimize human-vector contact, while improved personal hygiene, targeted vaccination campaigns and intensive community health education could help to control typhoid fever in the tropics.
Authors: Jonathan Salerno; Noam Ross; Ria Ghai; Michael Mahero; Dominic A Travis; Thomas R Gillespie; Joel Hartter Journal: Ecohealth Date: 2017-11-27 Impact factor: 3.184
Authors: Kevin Prestia; Sheila Bandyopadhyay; Andrea Slate; Richard O Francis; Kevin P Francis; Steven L Spitalnik; David A Fidock; Gary M Brittenham; Eldad A Hod Journal: Transfusion Date: 2014-05-19 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: So Jung An; Puthupparampil V Scaria; Beth Chen; Emma Barnafo; Olga Muratova; Charles Anderson; Lynn Lambert; Myung Hwa Chae; Jae Seung Yang; Patrick E Duffy Journal: Vaccine Date: 2018-04-20 Impact factor: 3.641
Authors: Benjamin S C Uzochukwu; Lausdeus O Chiegboka; Chibuike Enwereuzo; Usonwanne Nwosu; David Okorafor; Obinna E Onwujekwe; Nkoli P Uguru; Florence T Sibeudu; Ogochukwu P Ezeoke Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2010-08-16 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Jaffu Chilongola; Sophia Kombe; Pius Horumpende; Rebeka Nazareth; Elias Sabuni; Arnold Ndaro; Eliakimu Paul Journal: East Afr Health Res J Date: 2018-11-23