Literature DB >> 18592321

Quality of care for decompensated heart failure: comparable performance between academic hospitalists and non-hospitalists.

Eduard E Vasilevskis1, David Meltzer, Jeffrey Schnipper, Peter Kaboli, Tosha Wetterneck, David Gonzales, Vineet Arora, James Zhang, Andrew D Auerbach.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hospitalists improve efficiency, but little information exists regarding whether they impact quality of care.
OBJECTIVE: To determine hospitalists' effect on the quality of acute congestive heart failure care. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: Using data from the Multicenter Hospitalist Study, we retrospectively evaluated quality of care in patients admitted with congestive heart failure who were assigned to hospitalists (n = 120) or non-hospitalists (n = 252) among six academic hospitals. MEASUREMENTS: Quality measures included the percentage of patients who had ejection fraction (EF) measurement, received appropriate medications [i.e., angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACE-I) or beta-blockers] at discharge, measures of care coordination (e.g., follow-up within 30 days), testing for cardiac ischemia (e.g., cardiac catheterization), as well as hospital length of stay, cost, and combined 30-day readmissions and mortality.
RESULTS: Compared to non-hospitalist physicians, hospitalists' patients had similar rates of EF measurement (85.3% vs. 87.5%; P = 0.57), ACE-I (91.5% vs. 88.0%; P = 0.52), or beta-blocker (46.9% vs. 42.1%; P = 0.57) prescriptions. Multivariable adjustment did not change these findings. Hospitalists' patients had higher odds of 30-day follow-up (adjusted OR = 1.83, 95% CI, 1.44 - 2.93). There were no significant differences between the groups' frequency of cardiac testing, length of stay, costs, or risk for readmission or death by 30-days.
CONCLUSION: Academic hospitalists and non-hospitalists provide similar quality of care for heart failure patients, although hospitalists are paying more attention to longitudinal care. Future efforts to improve quality of care in decompensated heart failure may require attention towards system-level factors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18592321      PMCID: PMC2517998          DOI: 10.1007/s11606-008-0680-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  27 in total

1.  Validity of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality clinical practice guidelines: how quickly do guidelines become outdated?

Authors:  P G Shekelle; E Ortiz; S Rhodes; S C Morton; M P Eccles; J M Grimshaw; S H Woolf
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-09-26       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Self-reports of health care utilization compared to provider records.

Authors:  P L Ritter; A L Stewart; H Kaymaz; D S Sobel; D A Block; K R Lorig
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 6.437

3.  Care and outcomes of patients newly hospitalized for heart failure in the community treated by cardiologists compared with other specialists.

Authors:  Philip Jong; Yanyan Gong; Peter P Liu; Peter C Austin; Douglas S Lee; Jack V Tu
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2003-06-23       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Outcomes of care by hospitalists, general internists, and family physicians.

Authors:  Peter K Lindenauer; Michael B Rothberg; Penelope S Pekow; Christopher Kenwood; Evan M Benjamin; Andrew D Auerbach
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-12-20       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  HFSA 2006 Comprehensive Heart Failure Practice Guideline.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Card Fail       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 5.712

Review 6.  The hospitalist movement 5 years later.

Authors:  Robert M Wachter; Lee Goldman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002 Jan 23-30       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Deaths: preliminary data for 2004.

Authors:  Arialdi M Miniño; Melonie P Heron; Betty L Smith
Journal:  Natl Vital Stat Rep       Date:  2006-06-28

8.  Comparison of processes and outcomes of pneumonia care between hospitalists and community-based primary care physicians.

Authors:  William D Rifkin; David Conner; Alan Silver; Ann Eichorn
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 7.616

9.  Quality of care and outcomes of older patients with heart failure hospitalized in the United States and Canada.

Authors:  Dennis T Ko; Jack V Tu; Frederick A Masoudi; Yongfei Wang; Edward P Havranek; Saif S Rathore; Alice M Newman; Linda R Donovan; Douglas S Lee; JoAnne M Foody; Harlan M Krumholz
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2005-11-28

Review 10.  The role of in-hospital initiation of cardioprotective therapies to improve treatment rates and clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Gregg C Fonarow
Journal:  Rev Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.930

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review of outcomes and quality measures in adult patients cared for by hospitalists vs nonhospitalists.

Authors:  Michael C Peterson
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 7.616

2.  Do hospitalists affect clinical outcomes and efficiency for patients with acute upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage (UGIH)?

Authors:  Jorge T Go; Mary Vaughan-Sarrazin; Andrew Auerbach; Jeffrey Schnipper; Tosha B Wetterneck; David Gonzalez; David Meltzer; Peter J Kaboli
Journal:  J Hosp Med       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.960

3.  Hospitalist utilization and hospital performance on 6 publicly reported patient outcomes.

Authors:  Kate Goodrich; Harlan M Krumholz; Patrick H Conway; Peter Lindenauer; Andrew D Auerbach
Journal:  J Hosp Med       Date:  2012-06-11       Impact factor: 2.960

4.  California hospital leaders' views of hospitalists: meeting needs of the present and future.

Authors:  Eduard E Vasilevskis; R Justin Knebel; Robert M Wachter; Andrew D Auerbach
Journal:  J Hosp Med       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.960

5.  Hospitalist staffing and patient satisfaction in the national Medicare population.

Authors:  Lena M Chen; John D Birkmeyer; Sanjay Saint; Ashish K Jha
Journal:  J Hosp Med       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 2.960

Review 6.  Do hospitalist physicians improve the quality of inpatient care delivery? A systematic review of process, efficiency and outcome measures.

Authors:  Heather L White; Richard H Glazier
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2011-05-18       Impact factor: 8.775

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.