Literature DB >> 18591709

Weighting regressions by propensity scores.

David A Freedman1, Richard A Berk.   

Abstract

Regressions can be weighted by propensity scores in order to reduce bias. However, weighting is likely to increase random error in the estimates, and to bias the estimated standard errors downward, even when selection mechanisms are well understood. Moreover, in some cases, weighting will increase the bias in estimated causal parameters. If investigators have a good causal model, it seems better just to fit the model without weights. If the causal model is improperly specified, there can be significant problems in retrieving the situation by weighting, although weighting may help under some circumstances.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18591709     DOI: 10.1177/0193841X08317586

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eval Rev        ISSN: 0193-841X


  32 in total

1.  The relative performance of targeted maximum likelihood estimators.

Authors:  Kristin E Porter; Susan Gruber; Mark J van der Laan; Jasjeet S Sekhon
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 0.968

2.  Diagnosing and responding to violations in the positivity assumption.

Authors:  Maya L Petersen; Kristin E Porter; Susan Gruber; Yue Wang; Mark J van der Laan
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 3.021

3.  Application of inverse probability weights in survival analysis.

Authors:  Guoqiao Wang; Inmaculada Aban
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  Does Collaboration Make Any Difference? Linking Collaborative Governance to Environmental Outcomes.

Authors:  Tyler Scott
Journal:  J Policy Anal Manage       Date:  2015-04-08

5.  The comparative effect of episodes of chiropractic and medical treatment on the health of older adults.

Authors:  Paula A Weigel; Jason Hockenberry; Suzanne E Bentler; Fredric D Wolinsky
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 1.437

6.  Chiropractic use in the Medicare population: prevalence, patterns, and associations with 1-year changes in health and satisfaction with care.

Authors:  Paula A M Weigel; Jason M Hockenberry; Fredric D Wolinsky
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 1.437

7.  Who wants a free brain scan? Assessing and correcting for recruitment biases in a population-based sMRI pilot study.

Authors:  Mary Ganguli; Ching-Wen Lee; Tiffany Hughes; Beth E Snitz; Jennifer Jakubcak; Ranjan Duara; Chung-Chou H Chang
Journal:  Brain Imaging Behav       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.978

8.  Investigating differences in treatment effect estimates between propensity score matching and weighting: a demonstration using STAR*D trial data.

Authors:  Alan R Ellis; Stacie B Dusetzina; Richard A Hansen; Bradley N Gaynes; Joel F Farley; Til Stürmer
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 2.890

9.  The impact of information about the female condom on female condom use among males and females from a US urban community.

Authors:  Emil N Coman; Margaret R Weeks; Itzhak Yanovitzky; Eugen Iordache; Russell Barbour; Maria A Coman; Tania B Huedo-Medina
Journal:  AIDS Behav       Date:  2013-07

10.  Input Subject Diversity Enhances Early Grammatical Growth: Evidence from a Parent-Implemented Intervention.

Authors:  Pamela A Hadley; Matthew Rispoli; Janet K Holt; Theodora Papastratakos; Ning Hsu; Mary Kubalanza; Megan M McKenna
Journal:  Lang Learn Dev       Date:  2016-07-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.