OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether L-isoleucine was effective in the treatment of hot flushes and whether L-isoleucine, L-valine, or the combination of both amino acids reduced fasting serum homocysteine. METHODS: After a 1-week baseline period, 100 postmenopausal women experiencing at least five moderate-severe hot flushes per day were randomized with equal probability to one of four groups (phase 1/phase 2): placebo/L-valine, placebo/L-valine and L-isoleucine, L-isoleucine/L-valine, and L-isoleucine/L-valine and L-isoleucine. Phase 1 was 12 weeks long, and phase 2 was 10 weeks long. Patients took five capsules by mouth, twice a day throughout the study, with each capsule containing 500 mg of compound. Data were obtained from daily hot flush diaries, fasting blood work, and several questionnaires. The primary outcome variable was the percent change in hot flush composite score from baseline to week 12. RESULTS: In phase 1 of the study, there were no significant differences between the L-isoleucine and placebo groups for any of the outcome measures. At week 12, there was a mean 13.9% decrease in hot flush composite score compared with baseline in the L-isoleucine group and a mean 25% decrease in the placebo group (P=.28). In phase 2 of the study, there was no significant change in fasting serum homocysteine levels associated with any of the amino acid therapies. CONCLUSION:L-isoleucine therapy appears to be ineffective in the treatment of hot flushes in postmenopausal women. L-isoleucine and L-valine, either alone or in combination, appear to have no effect on fasting serum homocysteine levels. CLINCIAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, (www.clinicaltrials.gov), NCT00081952. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether L-isoleucine was effective in the treatment of hot flushes and whether L-isoleucine, L-valine, or the combination of both amino acids reduced fasting serum homocysteine. METHODS: After a 1-week baseline period, 100 postmenopausal women experiencing at least five moderate-severe hot flushes per day were randomized with equal probability to one of four groups (phase 1/phase 2): placebo/L-valine, placebo/L-valine and L-isoleucine, L-isoleucine/L-valine, and L-isoleucine/L-valine and L-isoleucine. Phase 1 was 12 weeks long, and phase 2 was 10 weeks long. Patients took five capsules by mouth, twice a day throughout the study, with each capsule containing 500 mg of compound. Data were obtained from daily hot flush diaries, fasting blood work, and several questionnaires. The primary outcome variable was the percent change in hot flush composite score from baseline to week 12. RESULTS: In phase 1 of the study, there were no significant differences between the L-isoleucine and placebo groups for any of the outcome measures. At week 12, there was a mean 13.9% decrease in hot flush composite score compared with baseline in the L-isoleucine group and a mean 25% decrease in the placebo group (P=.28). In phase 2 of the study, there was no significant change in fasting serum homocysteine levels associated with any of the amino acid therapies. CONCLUSION:L-isoleucine therapy appears to be ineffective in the treatment of hot flushes in postmenopausal women. L-isoleucine and L-valine, either alone or in combination, appear to have no effect on fasting serum homocysteine levels. CLINCIAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, (www.clinicaltrials.gov), NCT00081952. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I.
Authors: Sireesha Y Reddy; Hiral Warner; Thomas Guttuso; Susan Messing; William DiGrazio; Loralei Thornburg; David S Guzick Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2006-07 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: J E Blumel; C Castelo-Branco; L Binfa; G Gramegna; X Tacla; B Aracena; M A Cumsille; A Sanjuan Journal: Maturitas Date: 2000-01-15 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Jacques E Rossouw; Ross L Prentice; JoAnn E Manson; Lieling Wu; David Barad; Vanessa M Barnabei; Marcia Ko; Andrea Z LaCroix; Karen L Margolis; Marcia L Stefanick Journal: JAMA Date: 2007-04-04 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Eva Lonn; Salim Yusuf; Malcolm J Arnold; Patrick Sheridan; Janice Pogue; Mary Micks; Matthew J McQueen; Jeffrey Probstfield; George Fodor; Claes Held; Jacques Genest Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2006-03-12 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: James F Toole; M René Malinow; Lloyd E Chambless; J David Spence; L Creed Pettigrew; Virginia J Howard; Elizabeth G Sides; Chin-Hua Wang; Meir Stampfer Journal: JAMA Date: 2004-02-04 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Jacques E Rossouw; Garnet L Anderson; Ross L Prentice; Andrea Z LaCroix; Charles Kooperberg; Marcia L Stefanick; Rebecca D Jackson; Shirley A A Beresford; Barbara V Howard; Karen C Johnson; Jane Morley Kotchen; Judith Ockene Journal: JAMA Date: 2002-07-17 Impact factor: 56.272