Literature DB >> 18590891

Analysis of compression forces between varying sizes of cannulated screws versus rail external fixation for treatment of Jones type fifth metatarsal fracture.

Scot A Freschi1, Vassilios Vardaxis, Nic Dodson.   

Abstract

This study compared peak compression load in Newtons and stiffness in Newtons/millimeter for varying interfragmental screw sizes versus mini rail external fixation for the surgical treatment of Jones fifth metatarsal fractures. Four groups were included into this study: (1) Jones fracture with external fixation (Orthofix, Inc., McKinney, TX); (2) Jones fracture with 4.5-mm interfragmental cannulated screw; (3) Jones fracture with 5.5-mm interfragmental cannulated screw; and (4) Jones fracture with 6.5-mm interfragmental cannulated screw. There was no statistically significant difference between the peak compression achieved with the different groups of interfragmental cannulated screws: 4.5-mm interfragmental cannulated screw = 30.56 (+/- 9.40) N; 5.5-mm interfragmental cannulated screw = 30.69 (+/- 10.75) N; and 6.5-mm interfragmental cannulated screw = 32.84 (+/- 9.65) N. When comparing the compression achieved with the different groups of interfragmental cannulated screws to that achieved with the small rail external fixator (69.70 [+/- 14.69] N), a statistically significant difference was noted. There was no statistically significant difference in regard to stiffness (Newtons/millimeter) noted between the intramedullary cannulated screw groups: 4.5 cannulated screw 5.25 (+/- 1.96), 5.5 cannulated screw 5.50 (+/- 2.01), and 6.5 cannulated screw 6.75 (+/- 2.60). A statistically significant difference was noted when the stiffness (Newtons/millimeter) of the rail external fixator (12.69 (+/- 4.52) was compared to the stiffness achieved with the different interfragmental screws. The results indicated that the small rail external fixation device provided increased compression and an increased ability to resist bending when compared to the different intramedullary cannulated screws.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18590891     DOI: 10.1053/j.jfas.2008.04.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Foot Ankle Surg        ISSN: 1067-2516            Impact factor:   1.286


  1 in total

1.  Fifth Metatarsal Base Fracture Combined With Fracture of the Os Peroneum.

Authors:  Zheng Dan Wang; Hui Li; Lin Li; Quan Yu Dong; Xiao Heng Ding
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev       Date:  2022-10-06
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.