Literature DB >> 18590417

Autograft versus allograft with or without demineralized bone matrix in posterolateral lumbar fusion in rabbits. Laboratory investigation.

Julio Urrutia1, Nicolas Thumm, Daniel Apablaza, Felipe Pizarro, Alejandro Zylberberg, Felipe Quezada.   

Abstract

OBJECT: Posterolateral spinal fusions are performed to treat different spinal disorders. Autograft continues to be the gold standard; it is, however, associated with donor site morbidity and limited sources. Allograft has been used, but has been reported to result in lower fusion rates. Demineralized bone matrix (DBM) has also been used and reportedly increases the fusion rate in a variety of critical defect models. Different forms of DBM are available, not all have been independently studied. To evaluate the effect of a xenogenic DBM added to allograft on the fusion rate of posterolateral lumbar spine arthrodesis the authors designed an experimental study comparing posterolateral fusion rate using autograft, allograft, and allograft plus a xenogenic DBM in a validated animal model.
METHODS: A bilateral, 1-level (L4-5) intertransverse process fusion was performed in 45 male New Zealand rabbits. Iliac crest bone graft was harvested bilaterally from each rabbit. The rabbits were randomly assigned to 3 groups: Group I, Autograft, 15 rabbits; Group II, Allograft, 15 rabbits; and Group III, Allograft plus DBM in a paste form (Dynagraft). The animals were killed 8 weeks after surgery. Fusion was assessed radiographically and by manual palpation by 2 independent observers. The results were analyzed using the Fisher exact test and chi-square test.
RESULTS: The fusion rate was 46.6% (7 of 15 rabbits) in the autograft group, 33.3% (5 of 15 rabbits) in the allograft group, and 33.3% (5 of 15 rabbits) in the allograft plus DBM group (p > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Autograft produced a higher fusion rate than allograft in this spinal fusion rabbit model, but the difference was not statistically significant. Allograft plus xenogenic DBM showed the same fusion rate as allograft alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18590417     DOI: 10.3171/SPI/2008/9/7/084

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine        ISSN: 1547-5646


  5 in total

Review 1.  Factors influencing arthrodesis rates in a rabbit posterolateral spine model with iliac crest autograft.

Authors:  Jason H Ghodasra; Erika L Daley; Erin L Hsu; Wellington K Hsu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Repair of long bone defects with demineralized bone matrix and autogenous bone composite.

Authors:  Mehmet T Ozdemir; Mustafa Ç Kir
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.251

3.  A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Bone Union Rate Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Using a Polyetheretherketone Cage: Hydroxyapatite/B-Tricalcium Phosphate Mixture versus Hydroxyapatite/Demineralized Bone Matrix Mixture.

Authors:  Jemin Yi; Gun Woo Lee; Woo Dong Nam; Kye Young Han; Myung-Ho Kim; Jong Won Kang; Jonghwa Won; Seong Wan Kim; Won Noh; Jin S Yeom
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2015-02-13

4.  A partially demineralized allogeneic bone graft: in vitro osteogenic potential and preclinical evaluation in two different intramembranous bone healing models.

Authors:  Valérie Geoffroy; Pierre Weiss; Alexis Gaudin; Pierre Tournier; Jérôme Guicheux; Arnaud Paré; Aymeric Maltezeanu; Thibaut Blondy; Joëlle Veziers; Caroline Vignes; Manon André; Julie Lesoeur; Ana Barbeito; Raphaël Bardonnet; Christophe Blanquart; Pierre Corre
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Failure of a carbon fiber-reinforced polymer implant used for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Zeeshan Sardar; Peter Jarzem
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2013-04-15
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.