Literature DB >> 18589980

Energy balance and emissions associated with biochar sequestration and pyrolysis bioenergy production.

John L Gaunt1, Johannes Lehmann.   

Abstract

The implications for greenhouse gas emissions of optimizing a slow pyrolysis-based bioenergy system for biochar and energy production rather than solely for energy production were assessed. Scenarios for feedstock production were examined using a life-cycle approach. We considered both purpose grown bioenergy crops (BEC) and the use of crop wastes (CW) as feedstocks. The BEC scenarios involved a change from growing winter wheat to purpose grown miscanthus, switchgrass, and corn as bioenergy crops. The CW scenarios consider both corn stover and winter wheat straw as feedstocks. Our findings show that the avoided emissions are between 2 and 5 times greater when biochar is applied to agricultural land (2--19 Mg CO2 ha(-1) y(-1)) than used solely for fossil energy offsets. 41--64% of these emission reductions are related to the retention of C in biochar, the rest to offsetting fossil fuel use for energy, fertilizer savings, and avoided soil emissions other than CO2. Despite a reduction in energy output of approximately 30% where the slow pyrolysis technology is optimized to produce biochar for land application, the energy produced per unit energy input at 2--7 MJ/MJ is greater than that of comparable technologies such as ethanol from corn. The C emissions per MWh of electricity production range from 91-360 kg CO2 MWh(-1), before accounting for C offset due to the use of biochar are considerably below the lifecycle emissions associated with fossil fuel use for electricity generation (600-900 kg CO2 MWh(-1)). Low-temperature slow pyrolysis offers an energetically efficient strategy for bioenergy production, and the land application of biochar reduces greenhouse emissions to a greater extent than when the biochar is used to offset fossil fuel emissions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18589980     DOI: 10.1021/es071361i

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  17 in total

1.  Short-term biochar application induced variations in C and N mineralization in a compost-amended tropical soil.

Authors:  Shih-Hao Jien; Wen-Chi Chen; Yong Sik Ok; Yasser Mahmoud Awad; Chien-Sen Liao
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Co-composting solid biowastes with alkaline materials to enhance carbon stabilization and revegetation potential.

Authors:  Saikat Chowdhury; Nanthi S Bolan; Balaji Seshadri; Anitha Kunhikrishnan; Hasintha Wijesekara; Yilu Xu; Jianjun Yang; Geon-Ha Kim; Donald Sparks; Cornelia Rumpel
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Sustainable biochar to mitigate global climate change.

Authors:  Dominic Woolf; James E Amonette; F Alayne Street-Perrott; Johannes Lehmann; Stephen Joseph
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2010-08-10       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 4.  Feasibility of biochar application on a landfill final cover-a review on balancing ecology and shallow slope stability.

Authors:  Xun-Wen Chen; James Tsz-Fung Wong; Charles Wang-Wai Ng; Ming-Hung Wong
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Two structurally discrete GH7-cellobiohydrolases compete for the same cellulosic substrate fiber.

Authors:  Fernando Segato; André R L Damasio; Thiago Augusto Gonçalves; Mario T Murakami; Fabio M Squina; Mariadelourdestm Polizeli; Andrew J Mort; Rolf A Prade
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 6.040

6.  An environmental and economic evaluation of pyrolysis for energy generation in Taiwan with endogenous land greenhouse gases emissions.

Authors:  Chih-Chun Kung; Bruce A McCarl; Chi-Chung Chen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  CO2 mitigation or removal: The optimal uses of biomass in energy system decarbonization.

Authors:  Piera Patrizio; Mathilde Fajardy; Mai Bui; Niall Mac Dowell
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2021-06-24

8.  Mass production of chemicals from biomass-derived oil by directly atmospheric distillation coupled with co-pyrolysis.

Authors:  Xue-Song Zhang; Guang-Xi Yang; Hong Jiang; Wu-Jun Liu; Hong-Sheng Ding
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 9.  A systematic review of biochar research, with a focus on its stability in situ and its promise as a climate mitigation strategy.

Authors:  Noel P Gurwick; Lisa A Moore; Charlene Kelly; Patricia Elias
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-30       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Biochar from sugarcane filtercake reduces soil CO2 emissions relative to raw residue and improves water retention and nutrient availability in a highly-weathered tropical soil.

Authors:  Angela Joy Eykelbosh; Mark S Johnson; Edmar Santos de Queiroz; Higo José Dalmagro; Eduardo Guimarães Couto
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.