Literature DB >> 18589524

Bridging the generation gap in plants: pollination, parental fecundity, and offspring demography.

Mary V Price1, Diane R Campbell, Nickolas M Waser, Alison K Brody.   

Abstract

Despite extensive study of pollination and plant reproduction on the one hand, and of plant demography on the other, we know remarkably little about links between seed production in successive generations, and hence about long-term population consequences of variation in pollination success. We bridged this "generation gap" in Ipomopsis aggregata, a long-lived semelparous wildflower that is pollinator limited, by adding varying densities of seeds to natural populations and following resulting plants through their entire life histories. To determine whether pollen limitation of seed production constrains rate of population growth in this species, we sowed seeds into replicated plots at a density that mimics typical pollination success and spacing of flowering plants in nature, and at twice that density to mimic full pollination. Per capita offspring survival, flower production, and contribution to population increase (lambda) did not decline with sowing density in this experiment, suggesting that typical I. aggregata populations freed from pollen limitation will grow over the short term. In a second experiment we addressed whether density dependence would eventually erase the growth benefits of full pollination, by sowing a 10-fold range of seed densities that falls within extremes estimated for the natural "seed rain" that reaches the soil surface. Per capita survival to flowering and age at flowering were again unaffected by sowing density, but offspring size, per capita flower production, and lambda declined with density. Such density dependence complicates efforts to predict population dynamics over the longer term, because it changes components of the life history (in this case fecundity) as a population grows. A complete understanding of how constraints on seed production affect long-term population growth will hinge on following offspring fates at least through flowering of the first offspring generation, and doing so for a realistic range of population densities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18589524     DOI: 10.1890/07-0614.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecology        ISSN: 0012-9658            Impact factor:   5.499


  12 in total

1.  Pollen limitation in a narrow endemic plant: geographical variation and driving factors.

Authors:  Juande D Fernández; Jordi Bosch; Beatriz Nieto-Ariza; José M Gómez
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Interactions between nectar robbers and seed predators mediated by a shared host plant, Ipomopsis aggregata.

Authors:  Alison K Brody; Rebecca E Irwin; Meghan L McCutcheon; Emily C Parsons
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2007-10-27       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 3.  New frontiers in competition for pollination.

Authors:  Randall J Mitchell; Rebecca J Flanagan; Beverly J Brown; Nickolas M Waser; Jeffrey D Karron
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2009-03-20       Impact factor: 4.357

Review 4.  Floral adaptation and diversification under pollen limitation.

Authors:  Lawrence D Harder; Marcelo A Aizen
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-02-12       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Early snowmelt projected to cause population decline in a subalpine plant.

Authors:  Diane R Campbell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-06-10       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Evolutionary rescue beyond the models.

Authors:  Richard Gomulkiewicz; Ruth G Shaw
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-01-19       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Ecosystems effects 25 years after Chernobyl: pollinators, fruit set and recruitment.

Authors:  Anders Pape Møller; Florian Barnier; Timothy A Mousseau
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2012-06-17       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Indirect competition for pollinators is weak compared to direct resource competition: pollination and performance in the face of an invader.

Authors:  Jennifer D Palladini; John L Maron
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2012-12-15       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Coyotes, deer, and wildflowers: diverse evidence points to a trophic cascade.

Authors:  Nickolas M Waser; Mary V Price; Daniel T Blumstein; S Reneé Arózqueta; Betsabé D Castro Escobar; Richard Pickens; Alessandra Pistoia
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2014-04-13

10.  Realized tolerance to nectar robbing: compensation to floral enemies in Ipomopsis aggregata.

Authors:  Rebecca E Irwin
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2009-03-20       Impact factor: 4.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.