Literature DB >> 18589502

Neurocomputational mechanisms of reinforcement-guided learning in humans: a review.

Michael X Cohen1.   

Abstract

Adapting decision making according to dynamic and probabilistic changes in action-reward contingencies is critical for survival in a competitive and resource-limited world. Much research has focused on elucidating the neural systems and computations that underlie how the brain identifies whether the consequences of actions are relatively good or bad. In contrast, less empirical research has focused on the mechanisms by which reinforcements might be used to guide decision making. Here, I review recent studies in which an attempt to bridge this gap has been made by characterizing how humans use reward information to guide and optimize decision making. Regions that have been implicated in reinforcement processing, including the striatum, orbitofrontal cortex, and anterior cingulate, also seem to mediate how reinforcements are used to adjust subsequent decision making. This research provides insights into why the brain devotes resources to evaluating reinforcements and suggests a direction for future research, from studying the mechanisms of reinforcement processing to studying the mechanisms of reinforcement learning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18589502     DOI: 10.3758/cabn.8.2.113

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci        ISSN: 1530-7026            Impact factor:   3.282


  131 in total

Review 1.  The role of the striatopallidal and extended amygdala systems in drug addiction.

Authors:  G F Koob
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1999-06-29       Impact factor: 5.691

2.  Matching behavior and the representation of value in the parietal cortex.

Authors:  Leo P Sugrue; Greg S Corrado; William T Newsome
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-06-18       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Prediction of immediate and future rewards differentially recruits cortico-basal ganglia loops.

Authors:  Saori C Tanaka; Kenji Doya; Go Okada; Kazutaka Ueda; Yasumasa Okamoto; Shigeto Yamawaki
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2004-07-04       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 4.  Biologically based computational models of high-level cognition.

Authors:  Randall C O'Reilly
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-10-06       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Individual differences and the neural representations of reward expectation and reward prediction error.

Authors:  Michael X Cohen
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 6.  A neural substrate of prediction and reward.

Authors:  W Schultz; P Dayan; P R Montague
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-03-14       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 7.  Distributed modular architectures linking basal ganglia, cerebellum, and cerebral cortex: their role in planning and controlling action.

Authors:  J C Houk; S P Wise
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  1995 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  Gene-gene interaction associated with neural reward sensitivity.

Authors:  Juliana Yacubian; Tobias Sommer; Katrin Schroeder; Jan Gläscher; Raffael Kalisch; Boris Leuenberger; Dieter F Braus; Christian Büchel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-05-02       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Dopamine: the salient issue.

Authors:  Mark A Ungless
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 13.837

10.  L-DOPA disrupts activity in the nucleus accumbens during reversal learning in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Roshan Cools; Simon J G Lewis; Luke Clark; Roger A Barker; Trevor W Robbins
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2006-07-12       Impact factor: 7.853

View more
  17 in total

1.  Examining Procedural Learning and Corticostriatal Pathways for Individual Differences in Language: Testing Endophenotypes of DRD2/ANKK1.

Authors:  Joanna C Lee; Kathryn L Mueller; J Bruce Tomblin
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 2.331

Review 2.  CNTRICS final task selection: long-term memory.

Authors:  John D Ragland; Roshan Cools; Michael Frank; Diego A Pizzagalli; Alison Preston; Charan Ranganath; Anthony D Wagner
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2008-10-16       Impact factor: 9.306

3.  Impulsivity and predictive control are associated with suboptimal action-selection and action-value learning in regular gamblers.

Authors:  Matthew S M Lim; Gerhard Jocham; Laurence T Hunt; Timothy E J Behrens; Robert D Rogers
Journal:  Int Gambl Stud       Date:  2015-11-15

4.  Diagnosis of ADHD and its Behavioral, Neurologic and Genetic Roots.

Authors:  Kathryn L Mueller; J Bruce Tomblin
Journal:  Top Lang Disord       Date:  2012-07

5.  Dissociating the contributions of independent corticostriatal systems to visual categorization learning through the use of reinforcement learning modeling and Granger causality modeling.

Authors:  Carol A Seger; Erik J Peterson; Corinna M Cincotta; Dan Lopez-Paniagua; Charles W Anderson
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-12-05       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Better than expected or as bad as you thought? The neurocognitive development of probabilistic feedback processing.

Authors:  Wouter van den Bos; Berna Güroğlu; Bianca G van den Bulk; Serge A R B Rombouts; Eveline A Crone
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 7.  A universal role of the ventral striatum in reward-based learning: evidence from human studies.

Authors:  Reka Daniel; Stefan Pollmann
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2014-05-10       Impact factor: 2.877

8.  Reinforcing Motor Re-Training and Rehabilitation through Games: A Machine-Learning Perspective.

Authors:  Maurizio Schmid
Journal:  Front Neuroeng       Date:  2009-03-31

9.  Unconscious errors enhance prefrontal-occipital oscillatory synchrony.

Authors:  Michael X Cohen; Simon van Gaal; K Richard Ridderinkhof; Victor A F Lamme
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2009-11-24       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Ageing is associated with disrupted reinforcement learning whilst learning to help others is preserved.

Authors:  Jo Cutler; Marco K Wittmann; Ayat Abdurahman; Luca D Hargitai; Daniel Drew; Masud Husain; Patricia L Lockwood
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.