Literature DB >> 18589315

Effectiveness of a new tunneled catheter in preventing catheter malfunction: a comparative study.

Stavros K Kakkos1, Georges K Haddad, Roger K Haddad, Martha M Scully.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare infection and malfunction rates of two different types of antimicrobial-eluting tunneled cuffed catheters (TCCs) for hemodialysis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The HemoSplit TCC with BioBloc (silver sulfadiazine) coating (n = 100, control group) and the Tal Palindrome Ruby TCC, which has a novel silver antimicrobial sleeve and a spiral-z tip design (n = 100, study group), were compared in this case-controlled study. The main endpoints were TCC infection and malfunction.
RESULTS: Primary-assisted TCC patency was significantly reduced with the BioBloc TCC (71% and 61% at 90 and 180 days, respectively) compared with the Palindrome Ruby TCC (94% at 90 and 180 days, P < .0001). Multivariate analysis identified only the BioBloc TCC and common femoral access site as independent predictors of worse patency. The unadjusted relative risk (95% confidence interval) for TCC dysfunction with the BioBloc compared with the Palindrome Ruby was 6.0 (2.33-15.53, P < .001), and the relative risk adjusted for access site was 3.2 (1.71-11.96, P = .002). The infection-free rates of the two TCC types were similar (P = .36). The reintervention-free rate for infection or malfunction was significantly better with the Palindrome Ruby TCC (76% and 58% at 90 and 180 days, respectively) than with the BioBloc TCC (60% and 45% at 90 and 180 days, respectively; P = .03).
CONCLUSIONS: The results support the use of the Palindrome Ruby TCC on the basis of the significantly lower thrombosis and reintervention rate; randomized trials are justified to confirm this finding and to evaluate its role in the prevention of TCC infection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18589315     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2008.03.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol        ISSN: 1051-0443            Impact factor:   3.464


  7 in total

Review 1.  Update on Insertion and Complications of Central Venous Catheters for Hemodialysis.

Authors:  Peter R Bream
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.513

2.  A phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of tenecteplase for improvement of hemodialysis catheter function: TROPICS 3.

Authors:  James Tumlin; Jesse Goldman; David M Spiegel; David Roer; K Adu Ntoso; Martha Blaney; Joan Jacobs; Barbara S Gillespie; Susan M Begelman
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 8.237

3.  Randomized controlled trial comparing primary and staged basilic vein transposition.

Authors:  Stavros K Kakkos; Ioannis A Tsolakis; Spyros I Papadoulas; George C Lampropoulos; Evangelos E Papachristou; Nikolaos C Christeas; Dimitrios Goumenos; Miltos K Lazarides
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2015-04-29

Review 4.  Catheter-related bloodstream infection in end-stage kidney disease: a Canadian narrative review.

Authors:  Chris Lata; Louis Girard; Michael Parkins; Matthew T James
Journal:  Can J Kidney Health Dis       Date:  2016-05-05

Review 5.  A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials Comparing Two-Stage with One-Stage Brachio-Basilic Vein Fistulas.

Authors:  Stavros K Kakkos; George C Lampropoulos; Konstantinos M Nikolakopoulos; Ioannis A Tsolakis; Spyros I Papadoulas; Evangelos C Papachristou; Dimitrios Goumenos; Miltos K Lazarides
Journal:  Vasc Specialist Int       Date:  2018-09-30

6.  May position of hemodialysis catheter tip have a direct effect on its patency? Positive results of a preliminary study on its rotation.

Authors:  Mohammad Hassani; Mahdi Mohebbi; Mehdi Tavallaei; Seyed Mohammad Reza Hosseini Nodoushan; Moein Mirzadeh; Rana Hashemi
Journal:  Eur J Transl Myol       Date:  2022-05-19

7.  Comparison of treatment delay associated with tunneled hemodialysis catheter placement between interventionists.

Authors:  Yoo Hyung Kim; Hae Ri Kim; Hong Jae Jeon; Ye-Jin Kim; Sa Ra Jung; Dae Eun Choi; Kang Wook Lee; Ki Ryang Na
Journal:  Korean J Intern Med       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 2.884

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.