Literature DB >> 18588759

Reproducibility of nasal lavage in the context of the inhalation challenge investigation of occupational rhinitis.

Roberto Castano1, Gilles Thériault, Karim Maghni, Heberto Ghezzo, Jean-Luc Malo, Denyse Gautrin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The nasal lavage (NAL) method is increasingly used to assess changes in upper airways inflammation in the investigation of occupational rhinitis (OR). A good reproducibility of the method is fundamental to accurately assess changes in markers of inflammation in nasal secretions before and after inhalation challenges. The main objective of this study was to assess the short-term reproducibility of cells and cellular markers of inflammation in NAL in the setting of specific inhalation challenge (SIC) investigating OR. An ancillary objective was to assess the reproducibility of NAL in the context of two different SIC methodologies.
METHODS: Twenty-five subjects attended the laboratory for 2 separate days of NAL performed within the same week. On the first visit subjects underwent NAL before a SIC sham session and on the second visit before a SIC with the active agent. These prechallenge NAL measurements obtained on both days were used to analyze the reproducibility of the NAL method.
RESULTS: The reproducibility for cell differential counts was satisfactory for neutrophils (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.68), for eosinophils (ICC = 0.95), for macrophages (ICC = 0.77), and for epithelial cells (ICC = 0.73). The reproducibility of total cell counting was poor (ICC = 0.12). The reproducibility of ECP concentrations was satisfactory (ICC = 0.67). Eosinophil counts were reproducible in the context of two different challenge methodologies.
CONCLUSION: The NAL method was shown to be sufficiently reproducible to be considered useful for the monitoring of upper airways inflammation during the investigation of OR by SIC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18588759     DOI: 10.2500/ajr.2008.22.3165

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Rhinol        ISSN: 1050-6586


  7 in total

Review 1.  Asthma and rhinitis in the workplace.

Authors:  Olivier Vandenplas
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.806

Review 2.  Risk factors, predictors, and markers for work-related asthma and rhinitis.

Authors:  Denyse Gautrin; Jean-Luc Malo
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.806

3.  The normative value of inflammatory cells in the nasal perfusate of Chinese adults: a pilot study.

Authors:  Yong Zhang; Qiuping Wang; Yanqing Xie; Zhiyi Wang; Derong Li; Li Ma; Xinju Pang; Weidong Yu; Nanshan Zhong
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 4.  Occupational rhinitis and asthma: where do we stand, where do we go?

Authors:  Roberto Castano; Jean-Luc Malo
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 4.806

Review 5.  Biomarkers in Occupational Asthma.

Authors:  Javier Dominguez-Ortega; Pilar Barranco; Rosa Rodríguez-Pérez; Santiago Quirce
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 4.806

6.  Nasal blown secretion evaluation in specific occupational nasal challenges.

Authors:  Patrizia Pignatti; Gianni Pala; Marta Pisati; Luca Perfetti; Gabriella Banchieri; Gianna Moscato
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2009-08-23       Impact factor: 3.015

Review 7.  Usefulness of Biomarkers in Work-Related Airway Disease.

Authors:  Agnieszka Lipińska-Ojrzanowska; Andrzej Marcinkiewicz; Jolanta Walusiak-Skorupa
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Allergy       Date:  2017-05-11
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.