Literature DB >> 18588740

Use of item response theory to understand differential functioning of DSM-IV major depression symptoms by race, ethnicity and gender.

L A Uebelacker1, D Strong, L M Weinstock, I W Miller.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Psychological literature and clinical lore suggest that there may be systematic differences in how various demographic groups experience depressive symptoms, particularly somatic symptoms. The aim of the current study was to use methods based on item response theory (IRT) to examine whether, when equating for levels of depression symptom severity, there are demographic differences in the likelihood of reporting DSM-IV depression symptoms.
METHOD: We conducted a secondary analysis of a subset (n=13 753) of the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions (NESARC) dataset, which includes a large epidemiological sample of English-speaking Americans. We compared data from women and men, Hispanics and non-Hispanic Whites, African Americans and Whites, Asian Americans and Whites, and American Indians and Whites.
RESULTS: There were few differences overall, although the differences that we did find were primarily limited to somatic symptoms, and particularly appetite and weight disturbance.
CONCLUSIONS: For the most part, individuals responded similarly to the criteria used to diagnose major depression across gender and across English-speaking racial and ethnic groups in the USA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18588740     DOI: 10.1017/S0033291708003875

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Med        ISSN: 0033-2917            Impact factor:   7.723


  32 in total

Review 1.  Reviewing the Assumptions About Men's Mental Health: An Exploration of the Gender Binary.

Authors:  Dena T Smith; Dawne M Mouzon; Marta Elliott
Journal:  Am J Mens Health       Date:  2016-02-10

2.  Cross-cultural equivalence of HSCL-25 and WHO (ten) Wellbeing index: findings from a population-based survey of immigrants and non-immigrants in Sweden.

Authors:  Petter Tinghög; John Carstensen
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  2009-07-28

3.  International comparison of clinicians' ability to identify depression in primary care: meta-analysis and meta-regression of predictors.

Authors:  Alex J Mitchell; Sanjay Rao; Amol Vaze
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Testing a somatization hypothesis to explain the Black-White depression paradox.

Authors:  David M Barnes; Lisa M Bates
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2019-04-13       Impact factor: 4.328

5.  Demographic characteristics do not decrease the utility of depressive symptoms assessments: examining the practical impact of item bias in four heterogeneous samples of older adults.

Authors:  Natalia O Dmitrieva; Denise Fyffe; Shubhabrata Mukherjee; Robert Fieo; Laura B Zahodne; Jamie Hamilton; Guy G Potter; Jennifer J Manly; Heather R Romero; Dan Mungas; Laura E Gibbons
Journal:  Int J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 3.485

6.  Meta-analysis of DSM alcohol use disorder criteria severities: structural consistency is only 'skin deep'.

Authors:  S P Lane; D Steinley; K J Sher
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2016-03-28       Impact factor: 7.723

7.  Development of a brief questionnaire to assess contraceptive intent.

Authors:  Tina R Raine-Bennett; Corinne H Rocca
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2015-06-03

8.  Elevated depressive symptoms and incident stroke in Hispanic, African-American, and White older Americans.

Authors:  M Maria Glymour; Jessica J Yen; Anna Kosheleva; J Robin Moon; Benjamin D Capistrant; Kristen K Patton
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2011-06-09

9.  Young women's perceptions of the benefits of childbearing: associations with contraceptive use and pregnancy.

Authors:  Corinne H Rocca; Cynthia C Harper; Tina R Raine-Bennett
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2013-02-08

10.  Perceived symptom targets of antidepressants, anxiolytics, and sedatives: the search for modifiable factors that improve adherence.

Authors:  Melissa M Garrido; Kenneth S Boockvar
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.505

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.