Literature DB >> 18588374

Dalteparin versus aspirin in recent-onset branch retinal vein occlusion: a randomized clinical trial.

Mohammad-Sadegh Farahvash1, Marzieh Moradimogadam, Mohammad-Mehdi Farahvash, Shiva Mohammadzadeh, Ahmad Mirshahi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Retinal vein occlusion is the second most common vascular disease of retina after diabetic retinopathy, affecting 1.6% of the population above the age of 40. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of dalteparin and aspirin in patients with recent-onset branch retinal vein occlusion.
METHODS: A randomized clinical trial was conducted on patients with branch retinal vein occlusion of less than 30 days' duration. Ophthalmic, systemic, and hematologic evaluations were made. Visual acuity was measured with Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study chart. Patients in the dalteparin group received subcutaneous dalteparin 100 IU/kg twice daily for 10 days, then 100 IU/kg once daily for another 10 days while the patients in the aspirin group were given aspirin 100 mg daily throughout the study.
RESULTS: Seventy-eight patients were enrolled, 37 in the dalteparin and 41 in the aspirin group. The patients were followed for six months. The visual outcomes of the two groups were compared. Although dalteparin improved mean visual acuity slightly more than aspirin, no statistically significant differences were found between the groups at one (P=0.37), two (P=0.16), three (P=0.11), or six (P=0.13) months. Resolution of macular edema and development of new vessels made no statistically significant difference between the groups [(P=0.08) and (P=0.49), respectively].
CONCLUSION: In recent-onset branch retinal vein occlusion, no significant difference was found in the final visual acuity between the patients treated by dalteparin or aspirin. A further study with larger sample size is recommended.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18588374     DOI: 08114/AIM.0013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Iran Med        ISSN: 1029-2977            Impact factor:   1.354


  6 in total

1.  [The value of acetylsalicylic acid in retinal vein occlusion].

Authors:  B Mazinani; N Plange; P Walter
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  Retinal vein occlusion: time for action has come.

Authors:  Walter Ageno; Alessandro Squizzato
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2011-05-18       Impact factor: 3.397

Review 3.  Low molecular weight heparin for the treatment of retinal vein occlusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.

Authors:  Alejandro Lazo-Langner; Jeff Hawel; Walter Ageno; Michael J Kovacs
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2010-03-19       Impact factor: 9.941

Review 4.  Retinal vein occlusions: a review for the internist.

Authors:  Rossella Marcucci; Francesco Sofi; Elisa Grifoni; Andrea Sodi; Domenico Prisco
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2010-12-14       Impact factor: 3.397

5.  Antithrombotic treatment of retinal vein occlusion: a position statement from the Italian Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (SISET).

Authors:  Francesco Paciullo; Emanuele Valeriani; Angelo Porfidia; Marcello Di Nisio; Marco P Donadini; Rossella Marcucci; Domenico Prisco; Carlo Cagini; Paolo Gresele; Walter Ageno
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 5.752

Review 6.  Guidance for the management of venous thrombosis in unusual sites.

Authors:  Walter Ageno; Jan Beyer-Westendorf; David A Garcia; Alejandro Lazo-Langner; Robert D McBane; Maurizio Paciaroni
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.300

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.